My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-12-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 4:06:31 PM
Creation date
4/13/2012 4:06:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 12, 2002 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. . <br />5. #02 -2843 PROFESSIONAL PROPERTIES OF ORONO, 2765 KELLEY PARKWAY — <br />Conlinued <br />Even though the construction of the trail would not likely occur for many years, Gaffron stated the <br />City would need to require a letter of credit for the trail construction and an easement now. <br />White indicated that the City could offer no good solutions to the applicants regarding the trail and <br />easements. Although the City would need to require the easement, White felt it was highly <br />unlikely they would use it. White recommended the resolution indicate that the City would try to <br />place the trail other than within the easement, and if successful, they would extinguish the <br />easement agreement. <br />Ritter clarified that, if the City were successful in placing the trail within the MnDOT r -o -w, the <br />City would abandon the easement. <br />Murphy stated that the County would likely take back this roadway within the next five years and <br />encouraged the Council to move the Resolution forward with this added language. <br />Moorse questioned the Council with regard to the lighting issue. He asked what the Council's <br />opinion was regarding the character west of Willow Drive. Was the Council interested in a darker <br />rural area or a more urban section? He questioned how they felt the lot should look at night, as <br />well as, what the light along Kelley Parkway should look like. 0 <br />Murphy stated that the office building would need to be lit for clients into the early evening hours. <br />Moorse asked if the proposed shoebox style lights would be acceptable. <br />Gaffron stated that the Planning Commission recommended lights no higher than 20' and perhaps a <br />few more strategically placed near the handicapped parking area. <br />White indicated that he supported the height limit and suggested interested parties identify and <br />drive by other parkways to get a feel for what works well. For example, near Anderson Parkway in <br />Bloomington, White indicated there was a nice parkway with good lighting to look at. <br />Mayor Peterson questioned if there were actually two separate lighting areas to consider. <br />Gaffron indicated that the shoebox style light had been proposed for the parking lot, whereas <br />Dahlstrom had proposed a more decorative lighting within their development. In addition, he <br />recommended that the landscaping be put on hold until the whole design for Kelley Parkway would <br />be determined. Gaffron suggested the Council adopt the Resolution with the proposed amendment <br />and look at the development agreement for discussion at Thursday night's work session. <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4890, a Resolution granting <br />General Development Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 3 for Professional <br />Properties of Orono, Inc, with the amendment to allow the applicants to spread hay at the <br />site. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />• <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.