My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
11-21-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 4:11:25 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 4:11:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iVIIl�II.TT'ES �7F'g'� <br /> � O�ZOl�tO PLAN1olING CO�YISSIOI`T lO�IEETI1�tG <br /> lO�Ionday,October 17,2005 <br /> . 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3158�ohBaa�d D�velog�aae�a�, �o�tin�ue�� <br /> � Gronberg stated they would attempt to preserve as many trees as possible. Gronberg stated if the road <br /> were moved, it would lilcely result in the removal of even more trees. <br /> � There were no fiu-ther public conuneuts. <br /> � Fritzler inquired how this development differs from Luce Line Ridge. <br /> C'raffian statcd in that development the lots were approximately three acres in a five-acre zone, Gaffron <br /> indicated at that time there was no attempt to do any buffering of the views. Gaffron stated if the house <br /> lots could be moved up further,that might be another option to help reduce the visual iinpact of the <br /> � development. <br /> Gronberg stated in lus opinion the lots 2night be getting too small to construct a reasonably sized house <br /> and that he would prefer the lot sizes not be reduced any further. <br /> Leslie indicated he would be inclined to lceep the 30-foot setback. Leslie inquired whether Lot 3 has any <br /> covenants or restrictions on clearing the trees behind that house. <br /> � Gronberg stated in his opinion there should be a covenant or a conservation easement for Lot 3 to preveiit <br /> cutting of those frees. <br /> Kempf stated the clustering idea is a rather gray area,but when you weigh the view versus the amount of <br /> room,the developer should avoid the feeling of the houses being crowded. <br /> Rahn concun�ed that the setback should be kept at 30 feet. <br /> Bremer stated the�roperty owners would not need to build up to their setback. Bremer stated she <br /> personally likes the idea of pushing the lots up a little bit and that she would like to see the trees on Lot 3 <br /> remain. <br /> Leslie inquired whether the cul-de-sac could be located more at the intersection of Lots 1 and 2 and � <br /> whether that would help�ush the lots u�fiirther. <br /> Gronberg indicated that is just a temporazy cul-de-sac. <br /> Rahn concui7�ed the Council should review this application to see whether they would be agreeable to this <br /> type of clustering concept. <br /> Leslie stated he would like to see the Council support fihis application since it helps to preserve the rural <br /> oasis feel and still provide sufficient lot sizes. <br /> Gronberg stated in his view the development will not be very visible fiom Watertown Road. <br /> PAGE 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.