|
#OS-3131
<br /> July l3,2005
<br /> Page 2
<br /> Req.
<br /> Proposed Lot Data Min.
<br /> (bold typeface indicates non-conformity with RPUD standards) Defined: Rear
<br /> Lot Dry Area* Wet Area* Total Area* Width Depth Yard
<br /> Proposed Lot 1 (exstg. residence) 38,000 sf --- 38,000 sf 200' 181' 36'
<br /> Proposed Lot 2 (new SFR) 15,180 sf --- 15,180 sf 74' 181' 36'
<br /> Proposed Lot 3 (exstg. Church) 208,770 sf 7,000 sf 215,770 sf 460' S00' 40'
<br /> Proposed Lot 4 (new SFR) 14,050 sf --- 14,050 sf 125' 170' 34'
<br /> Proposed Lot 5 (new SFR) 14,070 sf --- 14,070 sf 90' 110' 22'
<br /> Proposed Lot 6 (new SFR) 17,880 sf --- 17,880 sf 90' 180' 36'
<br /> Proposed Lot 7 (new SFR) 15,470 sf 1,470 sf 16,940 sf 90' 130' 26'
<br /> Proposed Lot 8 (new SFR) 14,030 sf --- 14,030 sf 110' 130' 26'
<br /> Proposed Lot 9 (new SFR) 14,200 sf 2,960 sf 17,160 sf 110' 200'w 40'w
<br /> Proposed Lot 10 (new SFR) 15,200 sf 11,520 sf 26,720 sf 115' 270'w 40'w
<br /> Proposed Lot 11 (new SFR) 14,950 sf 13,310 sf 28,260 sf 140' 320'w 40'w
<br /> Proposed Road 31,100 sf --- �1,100 sf
<br /> 412,900 sf 36,260 sf 449,160 sf
<br /> (9.47 acres) (0.83 acres) (10.3 acres)
<br /> *These numbers represent approximate areas after proposed wetland fili and mitigation
<br /> w:These lot depths and rear yards are restricted by existing/proposed wetlands or ponds...
<br /> Residential Density for RPUD purposes (excl. church):
<br /> -Incl.Wetland and Road: 10 lots at 233,390 s.f. =23,339 sf/lot= 1 lot/0.536 ac. = 1.87 units/acre
<br /> -Incl. Road, Eacl. Wetland: 10 lots at 204,130 sf=20,413 sf/lot= 1 lot/0.469 ac. =2.13 units/acre
<br /> -Eacl. Road,Excl. Wetland: l O lots at 173,030 sf= 17,303 sf/lot= 1 lot/0.397 ac. =2.52 units/acre
<br /> PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW
<br /> A. Conformity to Zoning District and Community Management Plan (CMP)
<br /> The proposed plat is generally in conformity with the 2000-2020 CMP guiding of this area(known
<br /> as Parcel Group 3: east of Willow,north of Watertown,west of Orono/LL border,south of new Hwy
<br /> 12 corridor) for single family dwellings at a density of 2 to 3 units per acre. However, the CMP
<br /> currently does not provide guidelines for how a developer might obtain the higher end ofthis density
<br /> range. The CMP does not address minimum lot sizes.
<br /> The property has not yet been rezoned to match the CMP guideplan,and is still zoned RR-1B Single
<br /> Family Rural Residential district,requiring 2.0 dry buildable acres per lot,and a 200'lot width. The
<br /> proposed subdivision requires a concurrent rezoning. Planning Commission has discussed the
<br /> concept of allowing individual parcels or groups of parcels to be rezoned rather than the entire
<br /> reguided area being rezoned (See Exhibits H and K). Rezoning via the Residential Planned Unit
<br /> Development(RPUD)standards is proposed by staff as the most appropriate existin zoning option
<br /> for development at the guided density. Other options which might exclude some of the nuances of
<br /> the RPUD District standards would include creating a new"R-1B-1" %2-acre zone subdistrict, that
<br />
|