My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
10-17-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 4:00:47 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 4:00:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO PLANNiNG COMMISSION <br /> Monday, September 19,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#OS-3152 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, CONTINUED) <br /> Bohland stated he has met with the neighbors to the north and have spoken with them regarding the fuhire <br /> use of their lot. Bohland stated they are looking at how that lot can eventually be brought into this <br /> development at some point in the fttture. <br /> Bohland stated if the wetland on Lot 4 were mitigated,the extra 2000 feet would make it a contiguous <br /> two-acre site. <br /> Gronberg stated the Kintyre�lat stated there was a drainage ditch,but since that time the wetland <br /> de�nition has expanded considerably. <br /> Bohland stated for Lot 4 they would�refer to have the access off of Watertown rather than access off the <br /> new road. Bohland stated they feel Lot 4 would be a nice site for a home with a workable driveway. <br /> Bohland stated the driveway access off of Watertown for the property to the west would be eliminated <br /> and they would gain access off the new road. <br /> Bohland stated Lot 3 could be revised slightly to accommodate a house <br /> Leslie inquired about the elevation of the new road and how it would be blended with Watertown Road. <br /> Gronberg stated it would get filled four to�ve feet down in the lull, with a retaining wall along the west <br /> side. <br /> Rahn inquired whether there are any bluff setbacks on this site. <br /> Gaf&on stated they would not considered bluffs since they do not drain into a lake. <br /> Leslie inquired whether the road would go down from Watertown and then go up towards the back erid of <br /> the property and cut into the slope. <br /> Gronberg stated Exhibit E shows the cross-section of the road. <br /> Leslie inquired how high the road is above the wetland at its highest�oint. <br /> Gronberg stated it is approximately six to ei�ht feet aUove. <br /> Bohland pointed out there would be soine trees remaining along the edge of the roadway as we.l as some <br /> new open area. <br /> Jurgens inquired whether the City has the ability to look at clustering for this�roperty. <br /> PAGE 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.