Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3160 <br /> October 12,2005 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> It is staff's opinion that this should be a plat based on a stt•ict interpretation of the zoning <br /> and subdivision codes. <br /> Plamling Commission should address the issues noted above. If the conclusion is that <br /> this must be a plat, with all the implications noted above that come along with a plat, then <br /> the application should be tabled to allow the applicaiit to bring back a prelinunary plat <br /> drawing, showing specific setback impacts, etc. <br /> If the conclusion is that platting and the associated fees, etc. are not appropriate, aild that <br /> the applicant's combination/rearrangement/easement program is acceptable, the reasons <br /> for such a conclusion should be noted, and Plaiming Conunission should then consider <br /> whether the easement as proposed is acceptable, and whether the nonconfornung <br /> accessory buildings in the 5-acre lot should be removed or relocated. <br />