My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
09-19-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 3:49:25 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 3:49:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE � <br /> � ORONO PLANMNG COMIVIISSION NIEETING <br /> Monday,July 18, 2005 <br /> . 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3121 N�rrows Saloon, Continued) <br /> Sudlzeirner pointed out tlle big condominiums bein�constructed down the road are going io iucrease the <br /> iraffic in the area siguiCcantly more tlian what their e�l��tnsion project woulcl. <br /> Sudheimer noted they have passed all of their compliance checics in the past and that they have received <br /> letters from the police chief thanking theni for doing a good job. <br /> Sudheimer indicated they have experienced an increase in food sales and a decrease in liquor sales since <br /> tlle smoking ordinance went into effect and that they are attempting to expand their business to rneet that <br /> iiicrease. Sudheimer noted CariUou Coffee located across the sireet has an outdoor seating area that is i7ot <br /> enclosed, <br /> Leslie stated he would like to table tlie application to allow a parking study to be undertaken. Leslie <br /> stated additional discussion should be had in the future regarding the hours of operation and the other <br /> issues raised. <br /> Leslie moved to table Application #OS-3121,Nzt•rows Saloon,3382 Shoreline Drive,to allow the <br /> applicants time to have a traffic/parking study conducted as recommended by Staff. <br /> Anderst stated in his opinion the Planning Conulussion llas changed their thinking from the last meeting <br /> and are now requiring them to conlply witli additional itenis that have not been previously discussed. <br /> Leslie stated in his opinion the comments are consistent from last rnonth and that the restrictions on the <br /> hours of operation were discussed last uionth. <br /> Marcia Freese inquired whether a traffic study is the same as a parking study. <br /> Ralul stated the Parlcing Commission would like to see a parking study. <br /> Kempf seconded the above naotion. <br /> Ralm stated tlie parking siudy should follow�vhat Staff has recommended. <br /> Ai�derst inqttired what other issues would need to Ue addressed if the parking siudy dernonshates that the <br /> expansion is viaUle, Anderst requested they be provided with a list of ifiems that need to be addressed. <br /> Ralui stated the applicants' stttdy would need to Ue reviewed by ilie City's consultants. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> Brenler suggested the a�plicants follow Lhe list oritems outlined on page four of Stafi's reporl. <br /> PAGE 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.