Laserfiche WebLink
� MINUTES OF TAE J <br /> ORONO�LAN1vING COMMISSTON ME�TTNG <br /> Mondny,July 18,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> OLD BUSIN�SS <br /> 6. #05-3121 NARROWS SALOON,3382 SHORELIN�DRI'VE, CONDITIONAL USE <br /> 1'ERMIT, 6:29 p.m.—'1:34 p.m. <br /> Cindy Sudheimer and Jarnes Anderst, Applicants, were present. <br /> Gaffron noted this application appeared before the I'lanning Conzmission at their June meeting, at which <br /> time the applicatiou was tabled in order to allow the applicants time to revise their plans. The applicants <br /> have submiited revised plans and have eliminated the proposed kitchen addition in the northeast coiner of <br /> the building and are now proposulg a kitchen addition inside the building, fi1 addition,ihe douUle-door <br /> entrance extending infio tl�e sidewalk area has been eliminated and fihe ap�licanis are now proposing an <br /> interior access that will not encroacli further than the main wall. <br /> Gaffion indicated the outdoor seating in tl�e front has been expanded by two additional seats and would <br /> still encroach on the City's sidewalk easement. The applicants are proposing a slightly smaller outdoor <br /> seating area at the rear of the building, with the bar station sliown in the previous plans being eliminated. <br /> In addition,the applicants are proposing a screened trash enclosure at the nortl�end of the building. <br /> Gaffron indicated it is unclear from the revised�lans whether the planter boxes remain at the north end of <br /> the outdoor seating in the rear. Gaf$•on stated these planter boxes caused the need for a rear yard variance <br /> and are not pern�itted encroaclunents. Removal of bituminous so that the plant material can be placed <br /> into the ground would elinunate the need for a rear yard variance. <br /> Gaffron stated the revised plans show a minor increase in lot coverage,with t11e cunent lot coverage <br /> being at 38 percent. Gaffron stated the proposed fence in the rear is depicted at 5.5 feet, wliich would not <br /> be considered sfi�uctural coverage. Gaff�•on noted the fence wottld be considered structural coverage if it <br /> achieves a height of six feet. <br /> Gaffron stated the outdoor seatiug area in the rear of the builduig has been reduced froin 1,666 square feet <br /> to 1,292 sc�uare feet, with the seating bein�decreased from$4 seats to 60 seats. The bar statioli in the <br /> previous plans has also been eliiliinated. This area remains accessible only from within the restaurant. <br /> Gaffron illdicated the applicants l�ave eliminated the kitchen addition, which required a side yard setback <br /> variaiice and fiirther closed in an already restrictive drive aisle. The revised plans sl�ow an area within the <br /> Uuilding as an option for a kitcheii expansion, This area is approximately 152 square feet,reducing the <br /> pubIic floor area within the buildiilg by 152 square feet. The applicants have also eliiniiilted ihe exlerior <br /> vestibule and have inco�orated an iuterior vestiUule,llalf within the�roposed main restauranl/bar area <br /> and the other half within the banquet area at t11e western e�id of the buildin�. Elimination of the vestibule <br /> eliminated lhe need for a froilt y�rd sei:blck variance. Ilowever, the revised l�lans note ati option to <br /> straighlen out tl�e front entry wall iil the loeai;ion of the previously rec�uested exierior vesliUule. If i:he <br /> applicants�ursue straightening out this w111, a front ylyd selback variauce would be required; alihough <br /> the eilcroachnieirC would Ue no more that� what exists today. Llimination of the kitchen and vestiUule <br /> additions and inco�poration of them into the building suUsequent reduced the number of seats�roposed <br /> within ilte interior by ei�ht. Based on the public space reduction or 152 square feet, tlZe required off street <br /> parki�zg is reduced by two spaces. <br /> PAGE 5 <br />