Laserfiche WebLink
#U5-3149 <br /> September 19,2005 <br /> � Page 7 of 7 <br /> p�•oposecl pcai•kii�g expcznsion in the sozrthlvest corne�° of the sate, �°ec�iti��ing �r fi•ont <br /> - ycrrc�pa�°king vari��rree. Stczff hcrs p��vvicled coi��»zents �•egar°ding the existenee of�r <br /> hcrrclship ccnd the Plannzng Com�nission should dete�°�nine ��hetlzeJ° this expunded <br /> pctrking�area should be allo�t�e�l All other �•equi�°enzents with respect to setbcacks, <br /> builc�ing height, side and �°ea�° parking setbacks, ete. cr.��e proposed in cr <br /> confor•niing mcrTZne�•. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Is the expanded parking in the southwest corner of the site acceptable at a 14' setback <br /> from the front property line? <br /> 2. Is there potential for adjacent property owners to be negatively impacted by the <br /> proposed expansions, whether it be building or parking expansions? <br /> 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the conditiorlal use permit under the following <br /> stipulations: <br /> 1. The Planning Conunission should determine if a viable hardship exists to allow <br /> the expanded parking in the southwest corner of the site as a front yard parking <br /> setback variance would be required. <br /> 2. Prior to City Council review of the application, revised plans must be submitted <br /> incorporating the recommendations of the City Engineer letter, attached to this <br /> report as Exhibit J. The applicant will also be required to comply with any other <br /> forthcoming comments from the City Engineer. <br />