Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-31]5 WJM Properties LLC <br /> � June 16,2005 <br /> Page 22 <br /> In October 2003 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5059 granting a CUP amendment to allow <br /> the temporary use of fencing in place of final berming and landscaping along the north edge of the <br /> parking lot,pending resolve of issues with MCWD regarding wetlands and site grading. <br /> I�i Novetnber 2003 the City Cotmcil adopted Resolution No. 5084 granting CUP arid Site Plan <br /> Approval for a 20' x 75' addition along ihe south side of the existing detached 25' x 75' garage <br /> stnicture located near the south end of the principal building on the property. Tlus building addition <br /> has never been constructed. <br /> In November 2004 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5250 granting approval for revisions to <br /> the approved lighting plan for the large easterly parking lot. The lighting has been completed. <br /> Current Request <br /> As noted in the applicants' letters of request, the cttrrent proposal is two-fold: <br /> 1. The 20' x 75' detached garage addition was never constructed,and applicant has determined <br /> that WJM's current needs are for a slightly larger(50' x 100') addition located at the west <br /> end of the existing garage. This will be served by a driveway extending from the proposed <br /> new parking lot to be located at the south end of the large main lot. <br /> 2. The proposed new 200'x 200'parking lot will be a southward extension of the existuig inain <br /> parking lot lying east of the main building. This new lot takes the place of the 200' x 200' <br /> parking lot originally approved at the southwest corner of the building but never constructed. <br /> The area at the southwest corner might be used for a main building expansion in the future, <br /> but that is not proposed at this time and is not part of this review. <br /> The proposed building expansion is an allowed accessory use in the I(I�Zdustrial)District per Section <br /> 78-823. Section 78-825(b)requires that individual buildings in the I District be no less than 5,000 <br /> s.f. in area. The proposed building including the existing footprint plus additions will be 6,875 s.f <br /> Building height will be approximately 20' at the peak,meeting the 40' I District height limit. The <br /> building will be setback more than 300' fiom all lot lines and approximately 130' froxn the main <br /> building,nieeting all required pertinent setbacks. The building addition will bring tlus 23-acre site to <br /> approximately 27% structural coverage, far below the 45% limit for the I District. The building <br /> additioil is not visible from Highway 12 and should iiot require screening due to its relatively central <br /> location within the site. <br /> The exterior finish of the building addition is proposed to be pre-finished metal comparable to the <br /> existing accessory garage finish. Section 78-825(�(2)requires that"All subsequent additions and <br /> outUitildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of materials <br /> comparable to those used in the ariginal construction and shall be designed in a inarmer conforming <br /> with the original architectural design and general appearance." The principal Uuilding on the <br /> property is of concrete/stucco/EFIS material rather than pre-finished metal. Plaruling Conunission <br /> should detennine whether the Uroposed 5 000 s f addition (and perliaUS the 1 875 s f existii� <br /> buildmQ) should be Iinished to match the principal buildin� <br />