Laserfiche WebLink
crug�rr.e�zr.rati.o�a rt�zd preservcztiorT oj'e�aeloszn•e tr�z�l bz fferi�ag, e)preser>>t�tr'o��cend i.�rrprove�a.err.f of <br /> vde��i�s, a.nrl.,f)pr•eseri��rt.ia•r.or reirr.ter��retcctr.o�T of I.ocal lrcrrrl�rzcrrlcs. <br /> The Zoning Ordinance should include tlie following provisions; <br /> • fl Master Plaiuling requirernent for any subdivisiori or develo�ment greater thau 5 <br /> acres or guided for urbau density. <br /> • 1-1 statement of Uase density versus densiLy bonuses for pei�formance items listed iii <br /> the Conserv�tiolz Desibm Ordinance <br /> o R-1 Districl: base density 2 unils/acre;Uomis density 3 units/acre <br /> o R-2 District: Uase density 2 units/aex'e;bonus density 4 tmits/acre <br /> Tl�e Conservation Desi�i Ordin�nee <br /> Tlus ordinance would be a new doctmlent, triggered by provisions on the Coml�rehensive Plan <br /> and Zoning Ordinance. I�i essence, any development or subdivision�elter thaii 5 acres in size, <br /> or e;cisting within the urUau density area will be required to follow the pa7•ameters of the � <br /> COI15�1 Va�1011 DCSlgll OTd111c111Ce. Tliis is trtte even when no density boiius�vill be provided(i.e.: <br /> outside the urUan density area). Within the urban deilsity area, developers have the opporhniiiy to <br /> increase the base density Uy, essentially, goiug above and beyond ihe base requireinents of the <br /> Conseiroatioii Desi�n Ordinance. This ordinance must,therefore, clearly estaUlish its basic <br /> requireinents�nd its additional,perfomlance requireineuts necessary for a densiiy bonus. <br /> The Conservation Design Ordinance should iz�clude the following iteins <br /> • APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDUI2ES: <br /> o Developer inust review and res�ond to the Orono Natural Resource Systeuzs <br /> Master Plau (described in the Conipreliensive Plan section, aUove) <br /> o IF, the site exists adjacent to a documented corridor, the developer must <br /> review and respond to the existing analysis <br /> o IF, the site is not adjacent to a documented con•idor, the developer rnust <br /> prepare a similar analysis (doctunenting views, coiYidor enclosure, and <br /> landmarks tluough plaii aualysis and photographs) and submit it to the city <br /> for review <br /> o Developer shall pay a stand�rd,possibly per-acre, fee so that the city can hire <br /> a consuliant to prepare an ecological �ualysis similar to those prepared for <br /> the tl�ree pilot sites. <br /> o Developer niust stibmit a tree survey <br /> o Developer must submit� wetland inventoiy and delineation <br /> o Developer must submii a site survey showing existing drainage p1tl:erns <br /> 0 BASIC It�QUIIZ�MENTS: <br /> o Consideration of the existing drainlge system <br /> o BstaUlishmenl of a sLormwaler management system, using tnulti-cell <br /> h�eatinent�rineiples <br /> o Removal of invasive species and dise�sed irees <br /> o Protection of sigttificant iree siands �nd ��oodlands lhat supporL scenic and/or <br /> ecologicll go11s, including mii'igation of any such stands to be impacl'ed by <br /> developtnetlt aclivities <br /> o ProiecCion or exisling�vetlands, including augmenlation of bufrers, <br /> mitigation of impacis, and euhancemenl o!'debn-�ded s}�stems <br /> Orono Rural Oasis oSU, Inc. <br /> DRAFT summary report 5 March 2, 2005 <br />