My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
09-19-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 3:49:25 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 3:49:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�ivtJT�s or+ T� <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, July 18,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clocl:p.m. <br /> (#OS-3131 Steve Bohl, Continued) � <br /> Gronberg stated the developer is pursuing city water from Long Lake,which would be the better option. <br /> Rahn noted a letter dated July 8,2005,has been received froin Jim Dillman indicating he would not Ue <br /> opposed to the development if streetlights are not pei-mitied. <br /> Bremer moved,Fi•itzler seconded,to table Application#05-3131,Steve Bohl of Bohland <br /> Development,Inc., 190 Willow Drive Nortu and 177 Glendale Drive. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. � <br /> 9. #OS-3126 TODD AND 1VdYSTI COURNEYA,4620 TONKAVIEW LANE,VARIANCE, <br /> 9:24 P.11'1.—9:35 P.M. <br /> Todd Couineya,Applicant, was present. <br /> Gundlach stated the applicant is requesting a front yard setback variaiice to permit garage additions with <br /> living space above the existing two-stall attached garage for the pro�erty located at 4620 Tonkaview <br /> Lane. The front yard setback variance is needed to permit a front yard setbacic of 20 feet when 35 feet is <br /> norrnally required, 25 feet currently exists, and 25 feet was approved by variance in 1995. The applicant <br /> is proposing a S' by 25' addition to the front end of the existing attached garage and a 10' by 23' addition <br /> attached to the north side of the attached garage. The proposal also includes incoiporating living space <br /> above the new three-stall attached garage, The application includes a request to extend the existing <br /> attached garage five feet for�vard and constructing an additional stall to the north,which requires an <br /> additional five-foot encroachment on the 25-foot setbacic. � <br /> Staff recommends denial of the request. In Staff's opinion, adequate hardship has not been demonstrated <br /> to allow a further encroaehment on the previously approved front yard setback of 25 feet. Staff suggests <br /> the Planning Commission discuss the reasonableness of granting variances to allow for three-stall <br /> garages. <br /> Courneya had nothing to add to Staff's report. <br /> There�vere no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Rahn stated he is in agreement with Staffs recommendation and that it is dif�cult to approve the <br /> additional encroachment and living space, Ra�vz indicated he would be more receptive to the proposal �f <br /> there were not a further encroachment to the front. <br /> Coumeya stated in 1995,they did not realize how far the house was physically located from the road, <br /> Lourneya stated the 22-foot garage is not functional and that he �vould have asl:ed for an additional five <br /> feet at the time the �araje ���as originally proposed had he realized how the garage�vould be limited in <br /> space. <br /> Pt��E 2� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.