Laserfiche WebLink
��,�: <br /> rt�� :.. <br /> , °"� �HS� 16�II�t�J�'�+S Ok'1'�3� � <br /> °;<�;=' �IF�Ol�dO P��TYImtG C�I�ISS��l�t 1�/����'�iG �:'� o <br /> ��"`t��� T�/Ionda June 20 2005. �� <br /> <»�,.; Y> > � <br /> 6:00 o'clocic p.m. �.�,�.{� �, <br /> �� <br /> should be allowed. Potential limitations or conditions could addxess appropriate numbers and location of � <br /> � <br /> seating in relation to lot lines, easements,building walls, etc.; hours of allowed outdoor seating use; <br /> lighting of outdoor seatuig; fencing for outdoor seating;tlle use of umbrellas or other amenities;whether <br /> and where such outside seating may be appropriate for liquor service, and how such service is controlled <br /> (this may be a more appropriate fuiiction for the liquor license approval process); and any other aspects of <br /> outdoor seating that should be reviewed. <br /> 6. The Planning Con�unission should consider whether expansion of lot coverage by stnictures from <br /> approximately 36 percent to approxiinately 38 percent(where 15 percent is allowed)is justified by the <br /> commercial use and/or Uy the off-site parlting. <br /> 7. The Planning Commission should consider whether parlting for the proposed use is adequate, and <br /> if not,what�plan revisions/reduetions or use limitations nught be needed to malce the parking worlc. The <br /> � <br /> Planning Commission rnay wish to consider reqltesting that the applicant hire a consultant to provide a <br /> detailed parlcing siudy to show whether parking is an issue. <br /> 8. The Planning Commissioii should review whether the proposed sib age,lighting and trash <br /> handling/screening facilities are adequate. <br /> 9. Planning Comnussion should consider whether tlie current limits on hours of operation are <br /> appropriate under the expanded use. <br /> 10. Planning Cominission should review the written and oral public comments to deternune if there <br /> are other issues not identified that need to be addressed. <br /> Rahn inquired whether the applicants would like to make any coiiunents at this time or proceed with the <br /> public hearing. <br /> Anderst indicated he would lil:e to proceed with the public hearing. <br /> Rahn opened the public hearing and requested that individual's corrunents be held to a minimuin of five <br /> ininutes. <br /> Brad Hoyt, 2523 Kelly Avenue, stated the lot does not comply with lhe City's setbacic requirements � <br /> �r�GIE 37 <br />