Laserfiche WebLink
#os-3iao <br /> August 15,2005 <br /> - P�ge 5 of 5 <br /> 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommeiids approval of the variances to allow the increasecl pitched roof as no <br /> additional encroaclunent to the required rear yard is proposed and the additional height <br /> will not impact adjacent properties views to the lake due to the curvature of the shoreline <br /> in the cove. <br /> Staff recoininends that the Plaruiing Commission discuss whether variances should be <br /> granted to perniit covered entries, when the hardslup almost always is the location of the <br /> existing home on tl�e lot. If so, the Platuiing Conunission may want to determine under <br /> what set of standards covered entries, requiring variances, should meet (for exaniple, <br /> fiilly enclosed, unenclosed, size maximums, etc.). <br />