Laserfiche WebLink
#os-3iao � <br /> August 15,2005 — <br /> • Page 1 of 5 <br /> Date Applic�tion Received: 7-18-OS <br /> Date Application Considered as Com�lete: 7-18-OS <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-16-OS <br /> To: Chair Rahn and P1aruling Commission Members <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> From: Janice Gundlach, City Plaiuier� <br /> Date: August 9, 2005 <br /> Subject: OS-3140, Andrew & Kristen Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road, Side <br /> Street Setback&Average Lakeshore Setback Variances, Public Hearing <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Zoning District: LR— 1 C, Oiie Family Lakeshore Residential District ('/z acre min.) <br /> Lot Area: 0.71 acres (30,927 s.f.) <br /> Lot Width: 97' @ shoreline; 153' @ 75' setback <br /> Application Summary: Applicant reqttests the following variances in order to construct a <br /> 12/12 pitch roof where a 4/10 pitch roof curreiltly e�ists, which will increase the ceiling <br /> height in the main level kitchen/living area and add a 1/2 story over the existing main <br /> level bedrooms: <br /> 1. Rear yard setback variance to permit rear yard setback of 20' when 30' is <br /> normally required, 20' currently exists, and 20' was peniiitted by variance in <br /> 1968. <br /> 2. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit the new roof structure to encroach <br /> into the required setback (no further lake encroachment is proposed however the <br /> increased height proposed requires approval of this variance). <br /> And, also the following variance to allow a covered entry over the existing stoop: <br /> 1. Rear yard setback variance to perinit a rear yard setback of 15' where 30' is <br /> normally required aud 20' currently exists, and 20' was perinitted by variance in <br /> 1968. <br /> Staff Recomme�7�latioiz: Staff recommeilds approval of the variances to allow the <br /> increased pitch roof as no additional encroaclunent to the required rear yard is proposed <br /> and the additional height will uot impact adjacent properties views to the lake due to the <br /> curvature of the shoreline in the cove. <br /> Staff reconu�lends that the Plamung Commission discuss whether variances should be <br /> granted to permit covered entries, when the hardship almost always is the location of the <br /> existing home on the lot. If so, the Plaiuiing Conunission inay want to determine under <br /> what set of staiidards covered entries, requiring variances, should meet (for example, <br /> fiilly enclosed, unei7closed, size maximums). <br /> Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections <br /> Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. <br /> (b) Lots. The following minimum requireinents shall be observed: <br />