Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � Date Applic�tion Received: 6/21/05 <br /> llate Application Consiclei•ed�s Complete: 6/21/OS <br /> . 60-Day Revie�v Period Expic•es: 8/20/OS <br /> To: Chair Ralm and Plamling Commissioners <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Plaruiing Director <br /> t � <br /> Date: July 14, 2005 <br /> Subject: #OS-3128 Gregory O'Coiulor/Richard Fruen, 400/410 Big Island <br /> - Subdivision of a Lot Liiie Rearrangement -Public Hearing <br /> Zoning District: RS Seasonal Recreational District, 5-acre minimum <br /> Lot Areas: Existin Proposed <br /> 400 Big Island: 17,300 s.f. + (0.40 ac.) 20,600 s.f. + (0.47 ac.) <br /> 410 Big Island: 36,300 s.f. + (0.83 ac.) 33,000 s.f. + (0.76 ac.) <br /> Applicatiofi Sac�n»aary: Applicants request approval for a lot line reanangement between <br /> these two recreational parcels. <br /> Pertinent Code Sections: <br /> Section 78-568/569/570: RS District Standards <br /> Minimum lot area required= 5,0 acres dry buildable <br /> Minimuin lot width required=200', but no lot line rearrangement shall reduce any <br /> record lot width to less than 50'. <br /> Side Yard Setback: 10' for record lots less than 100' in width <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> A-Application <br /> B -Plat map <br /> C - Survey- Existing &Proposed Lot Lines <br /> D - Airphoto <br /> E - Correspondence <br /> F- Hennepin County Approval Fon11 <br /> G-Property Owners List <br /> Background <br /> Each lot contains a seasonal cabin. 410 also has a shed 1nd an exteiisive retaiiiing wall systenZ <br /> holding up the steep bluff at the lakeshore. No new construction or acfiivity is proposed. The lot <br /> line rearrangeinent is intended to resolve a historical encroachment issue that applicaiits thought <br /> had been resolved via a deed exchange i1i 1986, but which never received Cifiy approval. The <br /> cabin on 400 Big Island encroaclies approximately 1.4' onto 410 Big Island. The 10' property <br /> exchange leaves one coiner of the 400 Big Island cabin 8.6' from the lot line, where 10' would <br /> Ue required, Uut staff has conchided that requiring applicants to revise all their deeds and past <br /> actions to gain the extra 1.4' is not justified. <br />