Laserfiche WebLink
� nug�rl.e�r.tat.io�z a�zrl preser��nf.iora of'e�tclosu�•e a.�zrl Ut.jferir�.g, e)preser•�uclaor� �ciarl r:��ipro>>e�uerr.t af <br /> �,r.e�•vs, rr.n.rl,�)pr•eseri�atio�a or r�er.�r.te�l�retccl.r'o��.of I.ocril. l.rcrrdmar�%s. <br /> The Zoniilg Ordin�tnce should inclLide the following��rovisioi�s: <br /> • fl Master P1aiuling requirement for any suUdivisioii or development greater i:lian S <br /> acres or guided for urUau density. <br /> • A stalement of base deiisity versus density Uolluses for pei Porm�uce items lisled in <br /> the Coiiservation Desibm Ordinance <br /> o R-1 District: Uase densiiy 2 units/acre;UOl]ll5 C1Cl]Sl�3 Lll111:5I1C1'C <br /> o R-2 Disirict: base density 2 units/acre;bonus density 4 units/acre <br /> The Conservation Design Ordin�nce <br /> This ordinance would Ue a new dociunent, triggered Uy provisions on the Comi�rehensive Plan <br /> aud Zoning Ordinance. fii essence,any development or subdivision greater i:han 5 acres iu size, <br /> or existing within the urban density acea will be required to follow the parameters of the ' <br /> Conservation Design Ordinauce. Tl1is is irue even when no density Uonus�vill Ue provided(i.e.: <br /> outside the urban density area). Within the urban density area, developers have the opporhulity to <br /> increase the Uase density Uy, essentially, goiug above aud Ueyond ihe base requiremenis of ihe <br /> Conservation Design Ordinance. This ordinance rnust,therefore, clearly estaUlish its Uasic <br /> requirements and its additional,perfoi7nance requireinents necessaiy for a densiiy Uonus. <br /> The Conservation Design Ordii�ance should include the following iteins <br /> � APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES: <br /> o Developer must review and respoi�d to the Orono Natural Resource Systenls <br /> Master Plan (descriUed in the Conzprehensive Plan section, aUove) <br /> 0 1F, the site exists adjacent to a documented corridor, the developer must <br /> review and respond to the existing analysis <br /> o II,the site is not adjaceiit to a documented con-idor, the developer nnist <br /> pregare a siYZlilar analysis (docunlenting views, coi7idor enclosure, and <br /> landmarks tluough plan analysis and photographs) aud suUmit it to the city <br /> for review <br /> o Developer shall�ay a standard,possibly per-acre, fee so lhal the city can hire <br /> a consuliant to prepare an ecological aualysis siniilar to those prepared for <br /> the fii�ree pilot sites. <br /> o Develoi�er n�ust suUmit�irce survey <br /> o Developer must submit a weiland inventory and delineatiou <br /> o Developer must subntit a site survey sllowing existing draivage pati:erns <br /> � BASIC 1t�QUIR�MENTS: <br /> o Consideration of tl�e existing dr�inage systen� <br /> O E5L'1UIISI1171B11�Or 1 S�OT111WaL'Cl"111c111a��IT]Clll SySL'Etll, 115111�11111It1-CEII <br /> �.1'C 1llllell�:1J1'1l1 C 1��B5 <br /> o Renioval of invasive species and diseased irees <br /> o Proteclioi� of significant iree siands�ncl ��oodlands lhat 5upport scenic and/or <br /> ecological goals, includin�mitigalion or aily sucl� stands to be inlpacted by <br /> development aclivities <br /> o Proleclioil oI'exislittg�vetl�tnds, i�zcluding augmenlation of buffers, <br /> mitigalion of impaets, and eultancemenl of debn�aded syslems <br /> Orono Rural Oasis �sU, �nc. <br /> DRAFT summary repo�t 5 March 2, 2005 <br />