Laserfiche WebLink
" #OS-3131 <br /> July 13,2005 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Issues for Consideration or Discussion <br /> 1. Planning Conunission should determine whether RPUD is the�ppropriate rezoning <br /> option for this cievelopment. Planning Cornmission may also wish to discuss whether <br /> rezoning proposd Lot 3 (the remaining church property)to RPUD is appropriate, or <br /> whether it should remain as a conditional use in the RR-1B zone. <br /> 2. Applicant must provide a suitable plans a.nd elevation views showing how development <br /> of the site can meet the City's Conservation Design goals. <br /> 3. Under Orono's pending wetland ordinance revisions, if the wetland basin is between 2.5 <br /> and 5 acres as anticipated,the City would require a 25' buffer and adc�itional 20' buffer <br /> setback for structures from the wetla.Yid, which would have potential significant impacts <br /> on house placement and buildability for Lots 8-9-10-1 l. <br /> 4. If this site is developed via the RPUD standards, and depending oil�whether the road <br /> becoules public or private, it may be most appropriate to place the wetlands and ponds <br /> into a coriunonly owned outlot. Either way, the ponds and wetlands severely limit the use <br /> of Lots 9-10-11. <br /> 5. Planning Commission should review the conforinity with lot standards as noted on the <br /> table on Page 2. <br /> 6. Plauning Corrunission should discuss and make a recommendation as to whetl�er both the 15%limit <br /> and the FAR should apply to this development, or just the FAR. <br /> 7. Planning Com.mission should discuss whether the road should be public or private, and <br /> the ramifications of each option. <br /> 8. Platuiing Conuiiission should discuss the options for meeting the 10%recreation area <br /> requirernent. <br /> 9. Developer should advise as to whether he will be pursuing City water from Long Lake, <br /> and advise staff and Planning Commission as to any recent discussions he has had with <br /> long Lake in regards to this plat proposal. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Discussion of the above issues should provide applicant and staff with direction as to how the <br /> proposed plat should be revised. Given that there is a wetland moratorium in effect,no actions can <br /> be taken on the aspects of the plat that iuipact wetlands. Staff recommends tabling for fiirther plan <br /> refinement. <br />