07-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

Steve and Jean Skoro ��,T �j 2428 Casco Pt . Rd . Page 1 of3 � Wayzata, MN 55391 ( 952 ) 471-0010 HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the � property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, address alf the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it wil! not be considered. Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may not apply): 1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls." T�TE' feel ' easonab7 P »�t� ' wnt�lc3 i n�l i�r�a a SC-�-g��—gp��}.. 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." We do n9t live on h � ak GhnrP no do w wi �h t-o, �.�t we are affected bv restrictive hardcover requirements Our property is on the far limits of the 250' - 500 ' zone and extends into the 500' -1000' zone. 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." TYIP ac�cii t.i nn wni�l r3 hP rnnci c{-o�+ W; t�, t,�p r},arar,t.Pr af the e?c�stina s .rn�turP TrP addi t; nn an b Pn b�• one n�ighbor (Janet Roberts ) and she has expeessed approvalof the broject. 4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." We feel that the porch addition is necessary to the comfort and enjoyment of our property.