Laserfiche WebLink
^;1'`+i::£: <br /> � '+�� ,�.:. <br /> '`- �x� l�g1m1I1�'ES OT+ '�'�3[E <br /> , <br /> - .7,.,, �ISON�PL�NG �O1VI1���SI01�I�I��'�'�1VG ��� o <br /> �,::. <br /> �� 1VIonday,Jfltne 20,2005. ✓�� <br /> 1V <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. �,/,�.{� <br /> �S� <br /> should be allowed. Potential liinitations or conditions could address appropriate numbers and location of �,� <br /> i <br /> seating in relation to lot lines, easements,building walls, etc.;hours of allowed outdoor seating tise; <br /> lighting of outdoor seating; fencing for outdoor seating;the use of umbrellas or other anzenities; whether <br /> and where such outside seating may Ue ap�ropriate for liquor service, and how such service is controlled <br /> (tlus may be a more appropriate function for the liquor license approval process); and any other aspects of <br /> outdoor seating that should be reviewed. <br /> 6. The Planning Conunission should consider whether expansion of lot covezage Uy structures froin <br /> approximately 36 percent to approxirnately 38 percent(where 15 percent is allowed) is justified by the <br /> commercial use andlor by the off-site parlcing. � <br /> 7, The Planning Coirunission should consider whetlier parking for the proposed use is adequate, and <br /> if not,what�plan revisions/reductions or use limitations iniglit be needed to malce the parking worlc. The <br /> �� <br /> Planning Commission may wish to consider requesting tllat the applicant hire a consultant to provide a <br /> detailed parlcing study to show whether parlcing is an issue. <br /> �. The Planning Commission should review whether the proposed signage, lighting and trash <br /> handling/screening facilities are adequate. <br /> 9. Planning Commission should consider whether tlle current limits on hours of operation are <br /> appropriate under the expanded use. <br /> 10. Planning Cominission should review the written and oral public comments to deteirnine if there <br /> are other issues not identified that need to be addressed. <br /> Rahn inquired whetlier the 1pl�licants would lilce to make any coimnents at this tiine or proceed witli the <br /> public hearing. <br /> Anderst indicated he would like to proceed with the puUlic hearing. <br /> Rahn opened the public hearing and requested that individual's coirunents be 11e1d to a minimuin of five <br /> ininutes. <br /> Brad Hoyt, 2523 Kelly Avenue, stated the lot does not comply with the City's setbacic requirenzents � <br /> Pr��G�37 <br />