My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
07-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 12:16:29 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 12:16:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#OS-3121 <br /> � June I5,2005 <br /> . Puge 9 of 14 <br /> Without detailed floor plans of all existing busiiiesses, City staff can not calculate with <br /> any accuracy how much parking is teclulically required by City Code for all the <br /> businesses having rights to the lot. <br /> Six additional parking spaces located within the Narrows property are cunently striped <br /> and in use. These are not included in the 122 noted above within the nilmicipal lot. Other <br /> business properties abuttitig the municipal lot also have varying numbers of available <br /> stalls within their property boundaries that were not included in the 122. <br /> It should also be noted that the parking stalls constructed and striped are 9' x 16' with 22' <br /> drive aisles where normally 9' x 20' spaces with 24' wide drive aisles would be required. <br /> Although of no fault of the applicants, this contributes to the overall fimctionality and <br /> maneuverability of the parking lot. <br /> The Plaiuung Commission should discuss the parking needs required by the applicant in <br /> detennining whether any expansion, interior or exterior, should be permitted. The <br /> Planning Commission may also want to look inore closely at the hours of operation for <br /> the variolis businesses using the lot, as the 2000 review concluded that the prime hours <br /> for the applicant would be the least prime hours for the nzajority of the other businesses in <br /> this area. No actual traffic/parking counts or shidies have been done to deternline <br /> whether this has proven to be the case. <br /> Parking Issues Surrunary <br /> Parking required for proposed use: Interior Use 52 stalls <br /> Front Sidewalk Use 7 stalls <br /> Rear `Patio' Use 21 stalls <br /> 80 stalls <br /> Parking available on-site for proposed use: 6 stalls <br /> Parking shortfall on-site, to be made up iii muiucipal lot: 74 stalls <br /> Municipal lot stalls available for other users during peak times: 122-74=48 stalls <br /> Percentage of muiucipal lot required by Narrows: 74/122 = Gl% <br /> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> IV. EASEMENTS AFFECTING PROPERTY <br /> There are several easements affecting how the applicants can use tlleir property. An <br /> ingress and egress easemeut (Doc. #3520911) exists to provide access from Shoreline <br /> Drive to the City-owned parking lot. This exists along the eastern 7.5' of the property, <br /> and while not encroached u�on by any of the proposed improvements, its fiuictionality <br /> may be impacted by the kitchen addition as proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.