My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
06-20-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 11:34:51 AM
Creation date
4/4/2012 11:34:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MII�TUTES OF THE <br /> - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monclay,December 13,2004 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (12. #04-3067 LECY CONSTR UCTION ON BEHALF OF DENNIS AND AMANDA WALSH, <br /> 1354 REST POINT LANE� COiZ�I/tl[Bl�� <br /> Sansevere stated the City shou(d be considering solutions that clo not intrude upon the resideuts. <br /> Mrs. Walsh noted they did suggest pavement in that area, <br /> Sansevere indicated the City should consider a solution that does not impact this property. <br /> Murphy stated it does not sound like there is a total solution to this problem unless it does not snow. <br /> McMillan inquired whether tl�ere is lnother material that could be used rather than loose gravel or <br /> pavement. <br /> Gappa commented snow is pushed off the roadway into yards in a lot of areas,with other property owners <br /> also experiencing rock in their yards. Gappa stated the neighborhood parking was discussed but that it <br /> did not appear the applicants were interested in having that in tt�e ageeement. <br /> Mr. Walsh stated l�e does not llave a problem with having the parking, but by putting in the agreement the <br /> fact that this portion of the property is open to the general public raises all sorts of issues with liability <br /> and insurance. Walsh indicated he would prefer that language not be included in the agreement. <br /> Walsh stated he did discuss the public parking last time and that his neighbors do park in this area from <br /> time to tinie. Walsh stated the parking by the neighbors was not the reason for the gravel and that the <br /> gravel is there specifically for the snow. <br /> Walsh indicated they originally were willing to leave the area gravel,but after the call from the City <br /> saying if an easement agreement is not entered into,the City would rescind the approval. Walsh stated he <br /> took the phone call as sort of a tlrreat. <br /> Sansevere commented the situation does appear to have become somewhat confrontational. <br /> Wl�ite stated the idea of an easement was brought up after the applicauts left tl�e last meeting. White <br /> suggested the parties go back to the point they were at prior to the easement being suggested. <br /> Murphy stated the snow could be hauled away. <br /> McMillan inquired whether the hardcover would need to be removed. <br /> Walsh stated originally they were just going to leave it the way it is and just handle the snow storage on a <br /> handshake basis. Walsh noted Gappa had an issue witl�the possibility of the property being sold and the <br /> future owner opposing the snow storage. Walsh stated he then suggested he woulcl be agreeable to a ten- <br /> year agreement to allow the snow storage but that he would rather tlle area be paved. Walsh noted tliat is <br /> when other issues were being brought into the easement and that he had questions whether these things <br /> were applied to other people within the City. <br /> White stated he is willing to go back to the agreement the City Council had with the applicants prior to <br /> the request for the easenlent. <br /> PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.