Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3112 <br /> M�y 16,2005 <br /> . Page 5 of 8 <br /> variance to permit a 10' setback when 30' is normally required. A 30' setback for 1n <br /> attached garage to the existing home would not be att�inable. <br /> HARDCOV�R VARIANCE <br /> The applicant is proposing hardcover variances for the 75'-250' zone and the 250'-500' <br /> zones to permit 26.7% and 60% when 25% and 30% �re permitted and 40.8% and 54.9% <br /> exists respectively. These perceniages are b�sed on the property areas should a lot line <br /> re-arrangement be permitted. The applicant proposes to remove the existing detached <br /> garage and the bituminaus drive that ctirrently serves it, and to add an attached garage <br /> asld living additions to the existing footprint. The applicant proposes to construct an <br /> ac�ditional story and a lialf to the existing single story anci also to acid a l�ke sicie cieck and <br /> use the existing detached glrage slab as a patio. This results in a net hardcover reduction <br /> of 647 s.f. on the entire property, consisting of removal of 1,067 s.f. of hardcover within <br /> the 75'-250' zone and the addition of 420 s.f. of hardcover in the 250'-500' zone. <br /> It is also pertinent to show how the hardcover percentages for the lot at 1190 Wildhurst <br /> Trail are affected, as this is the lot inchided in the lot line re-arrangement. Hardcover <br /> within tl�e 0-75' zone will remain conforming at 0% where the hardcover percentage for <br /> the 75'-250' zone is going from 45.79% to 45.98% and in the 250'-500' zone from <br /> 21.69% to 25.03%. While the 0-75' zone and 250'-500' zones will remain conforming, <br /> the 75'-250' zone would rise 0.19% or approximately 6 square feet using the post lot-line <br /> re-arrangement areas. <br /> STRUCTURAL COVERAGE VARIANCE <br /> The applicant is also requesting a structt�ral coverage variance to pei7nit 16.5% structural <br /> coverage when 15% is normally allowed. The 16.5% is based on the lot area if the lot <br /> line re-arrangement is accepted. If a lot line re-arrangement were not accepted, the <br /> proposed structural coverage would be 17% with the cturent plan. The proposal includes <br /> 2,233 s.f. of house footprint �and a 230 s.f. lake side deck. Ct�rreiitly, the lot is <br /> conforming at 2,003 s.f. of structure or 13.8%. <br /> HARDSHIP STATEMENT <br /> Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br /> additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> HARDSHIP ANALYSIS <br /> li�considering npplicatio�rs for varirmce, 1/re Plniuiing Co�nrnission shall consirler t/re effect of the <br /> proposed variunce upon the hea/1h,safety aitd welfare of t1�e contmunity,e.risti�rg u�rd�mlicipated <br /> trriffrc cvndifiorts,/ight afrt!air,d�nrger of fire, risk to tlie pub/ic safety, n�rd t/ee effecl o�� >>rr/ues of <br /> propert��in tfte surro�urdi�rg area. T/ie Pln�r�ri�rg Cont�nissiott s/trrll consitler recoinmendinbr�nnr�v�l <br /> for varinnces,fro�it the literal provisioiis of 1/ie Zoning Code in irrstrurces where their stric! <br /> eirforcenreiet ivould cause«ndue hardsllip because of circun:slances unique to the iirdividual <br /> property unrler co�rsiderutinn, and s/ra//recnnr»re�rd rrpprova/only w/ren it is rlemni�struted!/rat suc% <br /> actiorrs will he in keepin��wilh!he spiril uird i�rlent�J'tbe Oro�ro Zoni�r�Cade. � <br /> Municipal Sewer Location & Lot Width Impacts <br /> Staff finds that a h�rdship is ii�lierent to the land based on the location of the existing <br />