My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
06-20-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 11:34:51 AM
Creation date
4/4/2012 11:34:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 16,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gundlach stated one of the neighbors has contacted Staff today to notify the City that they have not seen <br /> the latest revised plan. <br /> Larry Palm stated he has submitted gradiug plans a number of times based on staff comments and that <br /> they have taken steps to address all the concerns brought to their attention. <br /> Gundlach stated the City Engineer did review grading plans one and two. Gundlach indicated the City <br /> Engineer l�as not reviewed plans three aud four,which were submitted last week. <br /> Palm stated plan two was drafted based on comments from tl�e city engineer and in an effort to address <br /> issues raised in the southwest corner. Pahn stated grading plan number four is what they are proposing at <br /> this time. Pahn stated roof gutters and drain tile would be installed along the entire length of the house. <br /> Rahn inquired whether there are any public comments regarding this application. <br /> Maggie Erikson, 4455 Forest Lake Landing, stated they liave had a number of discussions with the <br /> applicants regarding the drainage. Erikson stated they handle the runoff from their properly but that the <br /> runofF from the hill needs to be addressed. Erikson stated in her opinion there is not adequate room for a <br /> swale and that they would prefer the retaining wall along the property line. <br /> Palrn stated the only difference with plan number four from tlie previous plan is ttlat the retaining wall is <br /> located five feet offthe property line to comply with the City's regulations. Palm indicated he also would <br /> prefer t(�e retaining wall to be located aloug the property line. <br /> Sandy Rasmussen, 1186 Wildh�ust Trail, indicated she has had au o}�portunity to discuss the project with <br /> the applicant and that she has two areas of concern, one dealing with erosion and the other dealing with <br /> the trees along the property line. Rasmussen noted the property was originally covered witl� buckthorn <br /> and t(�at in the process of developing the property the lot had been clear-cut. <br /> Rasmussen stated the house faces the lake and that in the area down to the water tltere at•e a number of <br /> mature trees they would like to have protected during the construction process. Rasmussen stated the <br /> applicaut has assured them that the trees would not be impacted during the construction b�rt that they <br /> would like a fence to be erected while construction is ongoing. <br /> PAGE 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.