Resolution 2606 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , . . ` �4h}�. ��I'�`t�..^ • � ORONO � �,�5` Clt� O . �� ; • � �'�'r �` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L £°',� • �,�. NO. 2606 � � ,-,. .__.• � iii. An addition to the north would require the removal of mature trees. iv. The septic system that serves the existing residence is located to the north side of the house. B) The expansion to the east side of the existing residence would � create the following hardships: i. The east side of the house is the most visible when approaching from the access drive. ii. Addition would make existing dining room area an interior room with no natural lighting and as a result will have no views or windows. iii. The existing porch structure would be lost if • expansion is to the east. C) Expansion to the south would create the following hardships: i. Main entry is located on this side in relation to driveway termination point and the garage location. ii. The existing Forch would be destroyed. D) Existing plantings and shrubs along the west side provide screening year round from adjacent residence to the west. . E) The major view windows and house layout of residence to the west living areas are on opposite side of house and the proposed � addition to the applicant's residence would provide no visual impact upon the existing residence. F) The existing house is located to the extreme west side of the five acre lot with 400+ feet of width. The existing residence is located 47'8" from the west lot line. The RR-lA zoning district requires 50 ' . G) The addition to the west side of the house would maintain the character of the Minnesota farm home providing the owner with a functional new floor plan. • H) The proposed addition to the west will not require the removal of trees on the property. Page 2 of 5