Laserfiche WebLink
u. ' <br /> �y� <br /> � c�t� o� oR,oNo <br /> • � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2605 <br /> • � • • <br /> A RESOLDTION GRANTING <br /> A VARIANCE TO <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.22, SOBDIVISIOA 1 & 2 <br /> AND SECTION 10.55, SIIBDIVISION 8 <br /> FILE #1382 <br /> WHEREAS, John and Lois Rogers (hereinafter "the app licants") are <br /> the owners of the property located at 755 Tonkawa Road within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> • WHEREAS, the applicants have app lied to the City for variances to <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 and 10.55, <br /> Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of new structural harcicover in the <br /> 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no structure or hardcover is normally <br /> • allowed, and a variance to allow encroachment past the average lakeshore <br /> setback Tine where no encroachment is normally allowed. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, B$ IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1382. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore <br /> . Residential Zoning District�. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> February 21, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance <br /> on a vote of 3 in favor, 2 against, based upon the following findings: <br /> A) The proposed addition is almost entirely over an existing <br /> � patio hardcover area, hence the impact of new hardcover is <br /> minimal. The applicant proposes to remove a long shed structure <br /> near the lakeshore, resulting in an overall decrease in 0-75' <br /> hardcover of 1 s.f. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone will not <br /> increase above the existing 21.9$ level. <br /> B) The necessary variance for encroachment past the average <br /> lakeshore setback line shnuld be approved since no views enjoyed <br /> • by neighboring property owners will be affected by this <br /> construction. <br /> Page 1 of 4 � <br />