My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-23-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2012 3:36:39 PM
Creation date
3/30/2012 3:36:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
., <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 23, 2002 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*3. #02 -2812 MARVIN AND MARY SMITH, 1940 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD, <br />VARIANCE -RESOLUTION NO. 4865 <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4865, a Resolution <br />granting a front yard setback variance to construct a two story addition over the <br />existing garage on the property located at 1940 Country Club Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, <br />Nays 0. <br />4. #02 -2813 MARK WELCH, 3625 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES <br />Weinberger explained that the applicant had received variances to construct a new <br />residence on the property in February, 2002. The applicant had not yet built the <br />residence and wished to make two changes to the approved plan. Weinberger reported <br />that the changes to the plan included shifting the residence on the west side from 8.5 feet <br />to 7.5 feet from the property line, straightening the residence to run parallel with the <br />property line versus the lakeshore and add 65 s.f. to the front of the house by adding a 4.5 <br />foot prow, "v- shape" glass point on the lakeside of the residence. <br />On August 19, 2002, the Planning Commission tabled this application and advised the <br />applicant to revise the site plan to push the house and eaves back on the property to meet <br />a 50' setback to the lakeshore. Furthermore, Weinberger noted, the applicant could not <br />exceed 660 s.f., which was the existing hardcover in the 0 -75' setback. <br />Weinberger reported that the new site plan does meet the parameters as established by the <br />Planning Commission. The revised application, however, requires review of the <br />following variances; Side Yard Setback to permit addition to be 5' and 7.5' from the west <br />property line. The 5' side yard setback was approved to provide one additional parking <br />space on the property. Structure within the 75' lakeshore Setback and Hardcover are <br />other variances for review. In order to redevelop this property, Weinberger noted that lot <br />Area/lot width, Side Yard Setback encroachment, and Required parking in a Residential <br />Zoning District were required variances for this parcel as well. <br />Weinberger advised that the Planning Commission was recommending denial of the <br />application as revised due to the fact that relocating the house to meet a 50' lakeshore <br />setback pushes the house further back on the property and into the shared driveway. The <br />new house on this property would encroach 5' to 6' into the driveway. The addition of <br />the 4.5' "V- shaped" prow and overhang causes the driveway encroachment. The <br />previously approved plan had the house meeting a 53' setback to the shoreline for the <br />house, with the overhang being 48.5' from the shoreline, but no part of the house at that <br />time encroached into the driveway. <br />Page 6 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.