My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
07-08-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2012 3:30:35 PM
Creation date
3/30/2012 3:30:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JULY 8, 2002 <br />7. #02 -2795 WJM Properties, 2605 Wayzata Boulevard — Commercial Site • <br />Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit — Continued <br />Moorse asked if the planting islands would contain any over -story trees. Ficktel stated <br />they would only contain evergreens because they needed trees that would not be affected <br />by the exhaust of the cars, and also that would not drop sap, etc. on the cars. <br />Sansevere moved, and Murphy seconded, to approve the site plan review subject to <br />the Planning Commission's recommendations, with the clarification that parking <br />restrictions noted in item 2 referred to the east lot only, and directed staff to draft a <br />resolution for the next City Council meeting. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />S. #02 -2796 Mark and Gina Kosek,1875 Shadywood Road, Variance <br />Gina Kosek was present. <br />Bottenberg stated that the application was to construct two decks and a walkway. One <br />deck would be at ground level, and the other off the second story. Currently there are 3 <br />patio doors on the lakeside of the home with no means of exiting the house. The total of <br />the decks would equal approximately 110 s. f. • <br />Bottenberg stated that the applicant had bought the property with the intention of <br />remodeling the existing house. After reviewing the foundation and other structural <br />limitations decided to tear down the house and then applied for a variance to allow a deck <br />within the 0 -75' lakeshore. The request was denied at the Planning Commission level. <br />The applicant then submitted building plans. At that time the hardcover complied at <br />approximately 22% in the 75 -250' setback zone, leaving 485 s.f of hardcover to use. The <br />driveway and some retaining walls were- constructed after the house was completed and <br />the certificate of occupancy was issued. The retaining walls were constructed to aid in the <br />change of grade for the driveway. When the applicant constructed retaining walls, she did <br />not know they were considered hardcover. There was also a second driveway on the <br />property that has been converted to grass at the instruction of the Planning Commission. <br />The Planning Commission voted to allow the two decks with the following conditions to <br />reduce the amount of hardcover on the property: <br />1. Remove the south driveway and replace with grass. <br />2. Remove shed located in 0 -75' setback. <br />3. Remove all stone borders. <br />4. Remove all unnecessary boulder walls. <br />Bottenberg stated that Kellogg had visited the site and determined that unnecessary stone <br />wall removal would result in a hardcover reduction of 50 s.f. (.29 %). • <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.