My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
06-24-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2012 3:29:46 PM
Creation date
3/30/2012 3:29:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 24, 2002 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #02 -2780 0 TTEN BR 0 THERS NURSERY— Continued) <br />to 1996, were omitted from the permitted uses of his PUD and asked if they could be put back <br />into the agreement. In fact, he questioned the rationale of many crossed out items on the PUD <br />Agreement, and even some that were not. As stated in the staff report some such uses "could be <br />seen as detrimental to the City of Orono.. ", Mr. Otten questioned realistically how could his <br />allowing a book store to occupy his property be detrimental to Orono. He asked why he had also <br />been told that he cannot advertise his Daisy Diner, if it is to be successful, the diner must <br />advertise its existence. <br />There were no public comments at this time. <br />White asked if Mr. Otten's objections surrounded the ban on advertising. <br />Mr. Otten stated that he also questioned why he could not have a waitress serve coffee or bring <br />people their orders after they've placed them. <br />Murphy questioned staff if anyone could recall the rationale behind many of the stricken items <br />being crossed off the list in the first place. He added that his only reservation in allowing <br />restaurants would be that a fast food service might move in. <br />• Gaffron indicated that Murphy made a good point, no one could explain why some of the items <br />were crossed off, while excluding others, like liquor stores. <br />Weinberger noted that the diner is an accessory use to the garden center. If a freestanding <br />structure or restaurant were proposed, the parking shortage would cause an issue. In fact, <br />Weinberger indicated that if a restaurant were built, it would be subject to public review. <br />Sansevere stated that he had no strong objections to allowing the diner as a permitted use and <br />asked why anyone might object to having a waitress bring them a cup of coffee. <br />White questioned what would be wrong with a tasteful neon sign in the window advertising the <br />diner. He stated that bookstores and others offer coffee etc. for spouses or visitors to enjoy as <br />they browse, and asked what the problem would be with that here. <br />Mr. O'Reilly mentioned that most of the comments he has received are from people who have <br />stopped for a cup of coffee or bite of lunch elsewhere, and then said if they had only known <br />Otten's Daisy Diner existed they would have waited to buy it there as they shopped. <br />Murphy asked if Otten has been limited from advertising in the paper. <br />Sansevere reiterated that he saw no conflict with allowing a restaurant at that location. He added <br />. that across the street there already are venues, fast food, coffee, etc. and this would not impact <br />the intersection greatly. <br />PAGE 3 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.