My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
06-24-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2012 3:29:46 PM
Creation date
3/30/2012 3:29:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 24, 2002 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />( #02 -2788 BRAD AND CAROL PASS — Continued) <br />Public Service Director Gappa stated that storm water trunk fee figures were based on an <br />analysis of 10 different parcels in the City that were currently undeveloped and could possibly <br />develop in the near future. The costs for storm water system facilities to serve these larger <br />parcels were divided by the total acres in each parcel to determine an average cost per acre for <br />storm water facilities. The average cost per acre for the 10 different parcels was $2,700. The <br />intent of the fee is to include both wetland and nonwetland areas in calculating the fee for a new <br />lot. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if there were questions regarding the park dedication fees. <br />Mr. Pass stated that these additional fees make it difficult for them to afford the whole project. <br />He added that they are not wealthy people, and simply have good intentions, he hoped that the <br />City might consider eliminating the wetland portion of the land in their calculations. <br />Sansevere stated that while he empathized with their situation, it would be precedent setting to <br />alter the fees. <br />Murphy inquired over the possibility of the City giving consideration to dry versus wet land. <br />Mr. Alcon stated that the Passes were hopeful that an exemption for the wetland could be made. • <br />Gappa stated that both wetland and nonwetland areas were used in determining the trunk fee. <br />The cost for storm water facilities is fixed and if only nonwetland areas had been used to <br />determine the fee, the trunk fee would be higher because there would be less area over which to <br />spread the storm water improvement costs. <br />Mayor Peterson explained that the City needs to treat everyone equally, therefore, they could not <br />make the exception the Passes were looking for. She inquired over the park dedication fees. <br />Gaffron stated that this is not a new sale, therefore the park dedication fee may be less than the <br />$5,300 cited, but not less than $3,200. <br />Mr. Pass reminded the City Council that they are working to give the City a park, an area of <br />conservation forever, and asked what the City could do for them to make it possible. <br />Gaffron suggested they discuss the right -of -way issue. Recently, Gaffron explained, the County <br />changed its philosophy with regard to trail access. Today, if the County requests R.O.W. and <br />builds a trail, and the City did not originally mandate the R.O.W., the City is required to <br />purchase the R.O.W. that was not acquired when the lot was sold. <br />Murphy questioned, if not for this situation, what the park dedication fee was meant to help • <br />offset. <br />PAGE 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.