My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2545
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2500 - 2599 September 12, 1988 - March 13, 1989)
>
Resolution 2545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2016 2:44:49 PM
Creation date
7/5/2016 2:44:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2545 <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 <br />FILE #1329 <br />WHEREAS, Thomas McNellis (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br />owner of the property located at 355 Woodhill Road within the City of <br />Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 3, Block 1 Woodhill Ridge, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter <br />"the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the <br />construction of a cantilevered deck which would encroach 4' into the <br />required 26' setback from a wetland easement, and for a front yard setback <br />�e•ariance to allow a 37' front yard setback where a 50' setback is normally <br />quired. <br />Minnesota: <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1329. <br />2. The property is located it the RR -1B Single Family Rural <br />Residential Zoning District._ <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October <br />17, 1988, and recommended on a vote of 4 to 3 to deny the proposed <br />variances based upon finding no adequate hardships to justify <br />granting of the variances. <br />4. The application was reviewed by the City Council on November 14, <br />1988, at which time the applicant agreed to proceed with a lot line <br />rearrangement with the property to the east, thereby eliminating the <br />necessity of the proposed front yard setback variance. <br />5. On November 14, 1988, the City Council voted 3 to 0 to grant <br />approval of the proposed 4' cantilevered encroachment into the 26' <br />wetland easement setback, finding that the actual wetland boundary in <br />• this specific case is not coincident with the easement line, and the <br />actual setback from the proposed deck to the boundary of the wetland <br />is approximately 321, which meets the intent of the wetland ordinance. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.