Laserfiche WebLink
� /%�Q ��� <br /> „ � �' � <br /> �'Q °�� <br /> ��e, - , CITY of �RONO <br /> `� �,ll <br /> \�'',� G'ti�;� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � � N 0. '� �`� �:, <br /> �,��S� ,. <br /> �— <br /> `VHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission <br /> recommended approval of the requested easement vacation and the City Council of the City of <br /> Orono finds that said easement vacation, as proposed, is in keeping ��ith the public interest in <br /> consideration of the following findings: <br /> 1. The easement vacation is in fulfillment of the conditions of the Road Agreement <br /> executed by and between the City, the applicants and Green Valley Associates <br /> in February 1999. That Agreement resulted in tne applicants' acquisition of the <br /> "Brimhall Triangle", a small parcel of land in the City of Long Lake adjacent <br /> to Highway 12 across from Brimhall Avenue. This land was encumbered by <br /> Highway Easements which MnDOT concluded were no longer needed, and <br /> applicants were enabled to acquire the parcel from the tmderlying owners, subject <br /> to conditians which gave the City and Service 800 certain drainage, utility and <br /> road easements to make this a useful vehicular access point for Service 800 and <br /> the adjacent properties in the future. <br /> 2. As part of the aforesaid Road Agreement, the City agreed to ��acate the 10' <br /> Drainage and Utility Easements in Otten's property adjacent to the Brimhall <br /> Triangle, in exchan�e for new easements alon� the new Hiahway 12 right-of-��ay <br /> line, which have been granted. This application is in fulfillment of the City's <br /> obliDation under the Agreement. <br /> ;. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. <br /> �}. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or use the easement <br /> portion to be vacated. <br /> 5. The appropriate utility companies have been contacted and none are opposed to <br /> the vacation. <br /> 6. The easement portion as it currently exists serves no public purpose. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />