|
� :r "e' u f N ,"•m �.'�� id'$'P�s�i'nw ��� � t�, �
<br /> ,f : .- y�. . � ^.._ � � i ��t �r r� ri fi.,^�-,zT `�'
<br /> 4 . xs Y4. .. �f' : ' �!'�" � _ � -
<br /> .. � � � . . f . , _ fi.X_: 3 A,�n T lr .t :.':1y'c'K �i'�.4
<br /> E. ' � .� ' A°r 3� n..'�"e. .�� J ��'' N �� �S �nN �k ' h ��� H'tr.,'' f� � $t��'•t';,
<br /> a'�y a .aif°'.,Y.ch.�>^':a�•...,....„f��.�� -���. �f�..M,�;.��"�ru�..��5�.�'�'�"��;vII3�ru.�i�s�'SS:����.'�.�,"a�.xc.c�.. ��'sX'S tia �� �y°r �.z'�k�ort..� z�.
<br /> f
<br /> d..�..��a't't" ,�.�[�r�u�r..,L .Z�_...
<br /> �i�i
<br /> � #6�5 Ringer Subdivision
<br /> x, . . Page S
<br /> ���`�*��, .
<br /> ;�;;,'��
<br /> .�
<br /> �w��
<br /> ��.�,::��:�.
<br /> ,��.'�•.,
<br /> � } Lot 6, Block 1
<br /> Peres PB61 thru PB66. Borings BB61 thru B863. Average perc
<br /> rates at both sites ar� acceptable. Slopes range from 2 to 4$.
<br /> Mottling started at a depth of approximately 2.4 feet, with
<br /> actual water level at 2. 5 to ? .4 ' . A standard mound system
<br /> should he used at both sites.
<br /> Lot 7� Block 1
<br /> Peres PB71 thru PB76. Borings BB71 thru BII73. Slopes average 2-3$ .
<br /> Perc rates were fairly slow, with the secondary si.te being somewhat
<br /> slower than the limit (however, the justification for Lot 5,
<br /> Block 1 also applies ).zerF�) . Actual water level r�inged from 1. 7
<br /> to 3.5 ' wi�h mottling gener.ally below 2. 5 ' . A standard r,iound is
<br /> recommended for both sites.
<br /> Lot 1, Block Z
<br /> Peres PAll thru PA18 . Borings BA11 thru BA:13. Slopes are very
<br /> flat. Mottling was ir�Qicated below 2 . 2 ' with actual water
<br /> ` encountered below 2. O ' . Two secondary sites were tested. All
<br /> �
<br /> sites are acceptable for a standard mound system.
<br /> �x =� $,'
<br /> .�.�+��a
<br /> �_� � Lot 2, Block 2 �
<br /> �°�5h{` neres PA21 thru PA26 . Borings BA21 thru BA23. Very flat slopes.
<br /> :�ottling occurs at 2 . 0 to 2.4 ' with actual water encountered
<br /> be�ow 2. 4 ' . Perc ra�tes on both sites are acceptable. A mound
<br /> syster� is recommendec3 for both sites.
<br /> Lot 3, Block 2
<br /> - .
<br /> ' Peres DA31 thru PA36 . Borings BA31 thru BA33. Slopes averaged
<br /> 2 to 5�. Mottling s'�arts at a depth of 2.0-3. 5' . Actual water
<br /> level was below 2.5 ' . Perc rates are' �cceptable. Mound sys�ems
<br /> are recommended for both sites.
<br /> Lot 4, Block 2
<br /> Perc� PA41 thru PA46. Borings BA41 thru BA43. Slopes are very
<br /> ���f = flat. Mottling generally was £ound below 2.0 ' , with actual
<br /> �. b:
<br /> �', ��"�.; water level at about 4. 0 ' . Perc rate for primary site is
<br /> �,,µ.��,�M` acceptable; perc rate for secondary site is slightly slow but
<br /> ;����ra
<br /> �;�e;, acceptable for a mound based on the justificatio.i referred to
<br /> ''�'�;;;' for Lot 5, Block 1. I recommend a mound system for both sites.
<br /> �
<br /> Lot 5, Block 2
<br /> Peres PA51 thru PA56. Borings B:�51 thru BR53. Slopes are very
<br /> flat. Mottling occurred below 1. 2 fee� ��ith actual water beio;v
<br /> 4. 0 feet. Perc rates are acceptable for the primary site and
<br /> slightly slow at the secondary site. (Refer to Lot 5, Block 1)
<br /> This lot has the overall worst set of gercolation rates of the
<br /> division. 'However, only two of the peres were taken in the
<br /> topsoil, the others, two of which were very slow, were at depth.
<br /> I recommend that a mound system be used on this site. If peres
<br /> were re-taken in the topsoil, ic is likely they would pass as
<br /> did nearly all others done in this nanner.
<br /> f.
<br /> -f•�,�-.r--rs� � � ���y# �i�`�` ,''�"�� r'�"" �. .� ��� .
<br /> - , �: ° 4 � a �4 s�Cw ,. �,�, t..'.b
<br /> , Y r �i��x'„ a �. r � �r '�,�Q :r sK�t�w� ,.fi�,x -� m�
<br /> �� i �i �� .�"1+ f e �-+ 3 7.�` 9; .�� .�-h �r a �t�+d� ��Y�` �+'�$ },�p (:'y��"� �k � :I� ��.x f,�+a�
<br /> • � a, � � �. , n f qT �
<br /> r . , g ��. ,/G
<br /> - J S v , ��` � , ., .. . � a A. � � 3- f \Y' r�
<br /> y / (( y,� f
<br /> .v...�C,�' ,rr . ,.v- �.Y' e . . , ,.u�. .. . ..'�srW��� �' _ .,.�;.Ln� _��rnn'�..^�1� $ ,i+�i�4�AS vu+.�l - , �° �� _..s .. L:,�
<br />
|