My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2576
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2500 - 2599 September 12, 1988 - March 13, 1989)
>
Resolution 2576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2016 2:35:08 PM
Creation date
6/29/2016 2:35:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />nm <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE (CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2576 <br />A) There is only approximately 5,500 s.f. of area within the <br />defined building envelope, with an approximate depth of 1001. <br />B) There is not adequate area to build a house and meet the 75' <br />lakeshore setback requirement, the street and side yard setback, <br />and hardcover regulations. <br />C) The property has never been assessed for sewer or water. <br />D) The property was valued for tax purposes in the past at a <br />reduced amount to reflect the fact that these are substandard <br />lots and not appropriate for residential construction. <br />E) The lot is subject to flooding and is in the natural <br />drainageway to -the lake for the surrounding watershed. Any <br />construction would be subject to periodic flooding. <br />F) The property is substandard in size in relation to other lots <br />in the area upon which development has already occurred. <br />G) The granting of a lot area variance for this property would <br />result in additional traffic congestion, surface water drainage <br />problems, surface water pollution problems for Lake Minnetonka, <br />congestion in the area, diminishing value to the surrouding <br />properties, and parking problems in the area. <br />H) The applicants have failed to demonstrate any hardship to <br />warrant the granting of the variance, as the granting of the <br />variance would be hazardous to the health, safety, and welfare of <br />the citizens of Orono. <br />I) The granting of the requested variances would be adverse to <br />the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Code of the City. <br />19. The Planning Commission moved on the second phase of the <br />application voting to recommend against the use of the residential <br />dock, an accessory structure, on a lot that cannot sustain a principal <br />structure based on the following findings: <br />A) The lack of the principal structure means that there is no <br />individual responsible for protecting the dock nor the boats <br />maintained at that dock. <br />B) An adjacent neighbor already has a dock located on Tract F. <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.