04-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

#05-3080 . April 18,2005 Page 3 of 7 ExhiUit P— Sheet C8-1, Detail Sheet Exhibit Q— Sheet C8-2, Detail Sheet Exhibit R—Sheet L1-1, Laudscape Plan Exhibit S — Sheet L2-1, Lighting Plan Exhibit T—Sheet A-1, Lower Level Floor Plan Exhibit U—Sheet A-2, Main Level Floor Plan Exhibit V—Sheet A -3, Upper Level Floor Plan Exhibit W—Sheet A-4, Front Elevation Exhibit X—Sheet A-5, Walk-Out Elevation Exhibit Y—Sheet A-6, Side Elevation (1) Exhibit Z—Sheet A-7, Side Elevation(2) Exhibit AA—Proposed Sign Exhibit BB—Green Space Illustration Exhibit CC—Homeowners Association Documents Exhibit DD—PC Report dated 1-14-OS GeneraI Development Plan Review This stage of the review is much like the final plat review stage, whicli ordinarily is not reviewed by the Planning Comnlission. Rather than go through all the requirements of the B — 6 zoning district, which was done in the attached concept plan PC report, the focus will be on fulfilling the requirements of the Concept Plan approval Resolution. The issues discussed below are a focus of the outstanding issues listed in the concept plan approval resolution. Architecture The City Council required that the applicant incorporate a more traditional style of architecture, including features such as a pitched roo£ The applicant presented the City Council with a front and walk-out elevation showing incorporation of a pitched roof and inore traditional front entry. The City Council accepted that design change but stipulated that at the General Developnlent Plaii review stage, the front elevation view should be fiirther refined to incorporate some type of feature in the roof, possibly a dormer. The applicants have submitted new elevation views, attached as Exhibit V-Y, which appear to ineet tlus requirement. However, in revising tlie architectural styles the site plaii has changed somewhat from when tlie Planning Commission originally reviewed this application. The changes consist of duplex style buildings with shared entrances in the center. The nuniber of units, lots proposed, square footages, parking and proposed grading remain virtually unchanged however the number of clusters is now five rather than the previous three. The finished floor elevations and basement floor elevations are comparable to those shown on the three cluster plan thus not changiiig the appearance of the buildings from neighboring sites. The revised site platl meets all setback and lot standards of the B — 6 Zoning District.