Laserfiche WebLink
f�05-3075 <br /> ' Marcli 21,20Q5 � <br /> P:�gc 1 of 3 �""-�� <br /> , Date Application Received: 12-21-04 <br /> Dute Applic�tion Considered as Complete: 1-5-05 <br /> 60-Day Revie���Period Expires: 3-5-QS extended to 5-5-OS <br /> Ta: Chair RaYui and Planning Conimission Members <br /> Ron Moorse, City Admiiustrator <br /> From: Janice Gundlach, City Plat�iier� <br /> Date: March 17, 2005 <br /> Subject: OS-3075, Katherine Taylor Homes on behalf of Mitch aild Kim Olson, <br /> 3275 Cannan Road, Hardcover and Average Lakeshore Setbacic Variaalces <br /> -Ptiblic He�ring <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Zoning District: LR- 1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential District(1 acre min.) <br /> Lot Area: 1.0G acres (4G,148 s.f.) <br /> Lot Width: 483.96' @ Shoreline; 215.5' @ 75' setback <br /> Applicatiorr Stcmj�ia�y: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct <br /> an attached tYuee car garage: <br /> 1. Hardcover variance to pernlit 30.73% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone when <br /> 35.9% was origiiially requested, 32.88% currently exists and 25% is normally <br /> allowed (see liardcover section below as hardcover calculations have been <br /> revised). <br /> 2. Average lakeshore setUack variance to pennit botl� additions to be constructed in <br /> front of the average lakeshare setback line. <br /> Staff Reco�n�stendatiorz: Staff reconuilends the following: <br /> 1. Appraval of the requested hardcover variance as shown on the revised plan as no <br /> increase ui 75'-250' zone hardcover is proposed and a net decrease of <br /> approximately 286 s.f. results. <br /> 2. Approval of a 0-75' zoiie hardcover variance is also technically required. Staff <br /> recoinmends approval of 1.92% hardcover as 3.45% currently exists and 502 s.f. <br /> is proposed to be removed, <br /> 3. Approval of a Iake setback variance is also required as tlre most lakeward <br /> southwestern wall of the llome is being reconstructed where it is setUack 68' fronl <br /> the lake when 75' is nornially required. There will be no fu2-ther encroaclunent <br /> towards the lake. <br /> 4. Approval of the averlge lalceshore setback variance as the pro�erty sits on a point <br /> where alinost the entire lot is closer to the]ake tl�an tl�e iieighboring homes. <br /> List of EYhibits <br /> Exlubit A—Revised Survey <br /> ExhiUit B —Revised Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit C—RenlovaUAdditian Illusiration <br /> Exhibit D—Revised Elevations <br /> Exhibit E—Revised Floor Plans <br />