My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03-21-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2012 12:04:53 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 12:04:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
hiRR-21-2065 12�07 ULTEIG h1PLS 7635?11168 P.04 <br /> � Ambe Ltd„ Struc6ural roofing review <br /> � Ufteig Project No.205,a291 <br /> March 18,2005 <br /> Pag�3 • <br /> b, The existing concrece block foundakion should be verified ta have or reinfarced <br /> as follows: <br /> i. For grade X sandy soiIs: 8" block-#4 vertical bars�40" o,c. or �5 vertical <br /> bars�0 48" o.c., 12"block-��4 venc�al bars C�48" ac. � � <br /> ii. For grade II sandy cla�y soils: 8" block - �4 vertical bars � 24" ac. or �S <br /> �vertical bars�40" o.c., 12"block-�4 vertical bars�46"o.c. <br /> iii. For grade III Clay soits: S" blcxk - �5 vertical bars� 32" a.e. or #6 vertical <br /> 6azs @ 40" o,c. or�7 vertical bars C�48" o.c., 12" block - �4 verfical bazs� ' <br /> 32"a.c.or#5 verfilcal bars�48"o,c, �� <br /> xv, The zeinEoccement shou3d be grade 60 and plared 3" £�com the inszde�ace <br /> o�the walt and the gzout shou�d have a miz�i.mum compressive strength of <br /> 2,5D0 psi at 28 days. <br /> ��4�ES5I0 AL QPIMON <br /> 3. The existing foundation and footirigs will be structurally adequate to support th� <br /> proposed addition praviding the sail bearing capacity and Eooting size(s) are <br /> vez�i�bied and the foundation walls are reinforced as recommended above. <br /> t <br /> GENER.A►L <br /> 4. The informadon, observ�ations, and opinioz�s stated in this report are based on an <br /> inspection made by Neil Groon a�nd information provided by Alexarrder Design <br /> Group. The inspe�tion tonsisted oE a visual walk-through abserving exposed <br /> elements and those accessible without the removal of finished matexi�ls. ' <br /> � 5, The observations and opinions expressed in this report were based on ouz <br /> proEessional engineering judgmer►t and professional practice, as well as the vi6ual <br /> izispection. <br /> 6. No other engineering was perforrned�r requested for this projert. <br /> 7. All work campleted shall be in accordance with standard industry practices and the � <br /> requirements of the code. <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.