My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2593
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2500 - 2599 September 12, 1988 - March 13, 1989)
>
Resolution 2593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2016 2:19:55 PM
Creation date
6/29/2016 2:19:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />1) <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2593 <br />Lakeshore setback: <br />Required = 75' <br />Existing Principal Structure = 55' <br />Existing Accessory Structure = 10' <br />Proposed Principal Structure = 61' <br />Proposed Accessory Structure = 59' (second level deck <br />extends 2' beyond lakefront of principal <br />residence) <br />Variance: <br />Existing <br />Principal <br />Structure = <br />20' <br />or 26% <br />Proposed <br />Principal <br />Structure <br />= 14' <br />or 18.6% <br />Existing <br />Accessory <br />Structure = <br />65' <br />or 86%. <br />Proposed <br />Accessory <br />Structure = <br />16' <br />or 21% (second story <br />upper level deck) <br />2) Hardcover within the 0-75' Setback Area: <br />Allowed = 0 s.f. <br />• Existing = 926 s.f. or 15.8% <br />Proposed = 812 s.f. or 13.5% <br />Total Reduction = 2.5% <br />B) The application involves no need for a hardcover variance <br />within the 75-250' setback area as applicant proposes removal of <br />major portions of existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback <br />area. <br />C) The use of the existing foundation will provide less of an <br />impact on the lakeshore property. <br />D) The original structure was placed on the property prior to <br />current standards for lakeshore development. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br />City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br />variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve <br />as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />• demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br />substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping <br />with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.