Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3079 <br /> J:tnuary 18,2005 <br /> � Page 3 of 4 <br /> i 52' house <br /> Lakeshore 75' 45' patio 56' proposed deck <br /> � 22' boathouse <br /> � <br /> � Structural Cover� e <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> i 57,053 s.f. (1.3 acres) Allowed: 8,558 s.f. (15%) <br /> Proposed: No Change <br /> � Hardcover Calculations <br /> Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 29,693 s.f. 0 s�.f 3,203 s�.f.* No Change <br /> (0/o) (10.79/o) <br /> 75—250 2��360 s.f. 6,840 s.f. 7,433 s�.f.* No Change <br /> ' (25/o) (26.76/o) <br /> � * After exchision of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br /> ! Hardcover Variance <br /> The applicant wishes to construct a wrought iron deck on the lake side of the existing <br /> ' home, within tl�e 0-75' hardcover zone. Although the deck consists of wrought iron, the <br /> Cities codes and fonnal hardcover policies coilsider the entire area of the deck and <br /> associated staircase as hardcover. The deck will be placed over the existing air <br /> conditioning units, and the churuiey shaft located on that side of the home will be <br /> removed to accommodate the deck. Also, a set of French doors will be constructed into <br /> the eastern wall of the house to provide access to the proposed deck. The existing <br /> hardcover level witlun the 0-75' zone is 3,203 s.f, (10.79%) with the applicant proposing <br /> 100 s.f. of new hardcover and removal of 100 s.f. This constitutes no increase above the <br /> current nonconforming level. However, because the nat�ire of the hardcover is changing, <br /> a variance is required. <br /> Lake Setback Variance <br /> The deck is proposed on the southeastern side of the home. Due to the curve of the <br /> shoreline, the proposed deck and existing home are located within 75' of the lake <br /> requiring variance approval. The proposed deck will be setback 56' froin the shoreline <br /> when 75' is nonnally required. <br /> Hai•dship Statement <br /> Applicant has provided a Urief hardsllip statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br /> additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Har sh' Anal s' <br /> li�conside�•i�rg applicatioris for t�ariaitce,tlte Plan�ting Cone�riissio�t s/iall co�rsider tlie effect of the <br /> /�roposed variaitce�rpo�t tl�e{tealt/i, safet��«�1d►>>elfa�•e of tlre coi�eni�ali�j�, existiirb•anrl a�itrciputed <br /> traffic co�iditio�rs, light and air,daitge�•of fre,risk to tlre public sufet��, ai�d the effect ai values of <br /> properry iii t/te stu•roundi�rg area. T/re Plaitniitg Conuuissioi�shall consirler recon�nteirdi�rg approva[ <br /> fnr variances froin t/re literal provisions of the Zoiii�ig Code iii ii�stairces where tlreir strict <br /> eirforce�nerrt►vould cause rrr�due liardship becnrrse of ci��cumstancc�s unique to the iirdivirluu[ <br /> properry under coi�side��ation, anrl s/iall reconrmeit�l approval only►>>/teii it is deuioi�strated tl:at srrcll <br /> actioirs►>>ill be i�:keepiir�rvitli the spirit anrl intent ojthe Oroiao Zortiit�Code. <br />