My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
01-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2012 12:05:50 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 12:05:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br /> i #OS-3081 Stonebay Lofts <br /> Jauuary 13,2005 <br /> � Page 7 <br /> i <br /> � Landscaping,Lighting, Signage <br /> i <br /> Landscape Plan.Pla�uung Commission should review the landscape plaii. Preliminary review by staff <br /> indicates an acceptable level ofplantings of trees aiid slu ubs. The City's landscaping consultant will be <br /> askedto comment. I�Z general,the 41,000 s.f.building footprintrequires 1 overstorytreeper 1,000 s.f. <br /> footprint,or 41 such trees. At least 30%of required overstory trees must be coniferous. Applicauts <br /> propose 5 ash, 10 map1e, 15 quaking aspen,and 4 weepuzg willow,plus 3 spnice and 12 ornamental h•ees <br /> (wluch coiult 2-1 toward the overstoryrequirement);doing the math,the total reaches 43,although the nux <br /> should include more coiufers. The 41,000 s.f.building would also require 137 shrubs as a n�rnun;this <br /> standard is more than met,with approximately 300 slu ubs shown on the plan. <br /> Li_ghting.The developer sliot�ld be asked to describe all outside lighting proposed for this buildi�lg other than <br /> the typical street lights, and provide a lightitig plan sheet for such lighting. <br /> Si�ge.'The developer should indicate auy identification signage intended for the building. Some site traffic <br /> signage is noted on Sheet C2.1. <br /> Impervious Surface Covera�e.I�npervious suiface coverage in the RPUD District is linuted to 50%. While <br /> Sheet C2.1 indicates the Lofts site llas 52.4%iinpervious area,the Stonebayproj ect in its entiretyhas an <br /> impervious area well below the 50% limit, so this is not an issue in staff's opiiuon. <br /> Engineer's Comments <br /> Please review the City Eiigineer's comments, Exhibit D. <br /> Final Plat <br /> Outlot E was created specifically for the Lofts,and must be final platted as a Lot in order for it to be used <br /> as a building site. The final platting process establishes the necessaiy perimeter drainage and utility <br /> easements which were not required of it as an outlot.The required wetland Conservation and Flowage <br /> Easement was established duruzg the earlier subdivision approvals,so that need not be required;however, <br /> the wetlands should be shown on the iiew plat drawings. No plat drawings have been submitted by the <br /> applicaut at this tirne. <br /> This approval process is fiuictionally approval ofPhase 2 ofthe StoneUayresidential development. Phase <br /> 2 final plat approval will inchide paynient of park fees,sewer and water connection fees, and stornzwater <br /> &drainage trunlc fees established within Exhibit M of the PUD 4 Ag7-eement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.