Laserfiche WebLink
il <br /> - ' Application Submitted: DecemUer 22,2004 <br /> Incomplete Letter: J:tnulrJ�4,2005 <br /> Application Completc: January 10,2005 <br /> 60-Day Review Expiration(Sitc Plan): March l l,2005 <br /> 120 Day Review Expiration(Subdivision): May 20,2005 <br /> To: Chair Ralui &Plamiing Conunission Members <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Plaluung Director <br /> Date: Jantiary 13, 2005 <br /> Subjeet: #OS-3081 "Stonebay Lofts"- Outlot E, STONEBAY("2670 Kelley Parkway") <br /> - Public Hearing: <br /> 1) RPUD Amendment/Site Plan &Buildiiig Plan Approval <br /> 2) Fuial Plat Approval <br /> Summarv of RequestNew applicants request an amendment of the Stonebay RPUD for changes to <br /> the owner-occupied condomuuum("L,ofts")building and site plan,requestuzg fuial site plan a�id building <br /> plan approvals as well as final plat approval for Outlot E as a single 2.5 acre lot for the condoliuiuum <br /> Uuilding. With a new builder and a new architect,this new proposal is similar to the single 3-story <br /> building proposal Plannulg Conunission reviewed last October.The subnutted plans identify 61 units <br /> rather than the 62 units originally ap}�roved. <br /> Property Owner: ZB Construction, Inc, -An�ie Zachman (purchase agreement with John Terrance <br /> Homes LLC) <br /> - -----------Planner/Engineer: Landfornl ----- _----------___ __....... __ __ __---..._ <br /> Architect: Bnice Lehrer <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Plaruiing Conuiussion should review the list ofpotential issues and determine whether these and/or <br /> additional issues require discussion. Au option is to review tlus site plau fiu-ther at yot�r Febn►ary 2 work <br /> session. Keytoyourreviewistodetermuiewhetherthemajorrevisionsareacceptable,especiallythe <br /> conversioii from two buildings to one building . <br /> IfPlaruiulg Coiimussion concludes that the proposed revisions are acceptable,then a recoiiuilendation <br /> for approval would be in order. If Plaiuiing Conunission concludes that one or more of the topics <br /> identified in this memo requires fiirther consideration, then tabling would be appropriate. <br />