Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3076 <br /> January l8,2005 <br /> - Page 3 of 5 <br /> � Structural Covera e <br /> ; <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> � 18,490 s.f. (0.42 acres) Allowed: 2,773.5 s.f. (15%) <br /> Proposed: 2,364 s.f. (12.8%) <br /> � Hardcover Calculations � <br /> Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> :. <br /> Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 7540 s.f. 0 s.f 650 s.f. 0 s.f. <br /> (0%) (8.6%) (0%) <br /> 75 —250 10,950 s.f. 2��37.5 s.f. 2,538 s.f. 2,737 s.f. <br /> (25%) (23.05%)* (25%) <br /> * Based on PC report from 2003 application <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Lot Area/Lot Width Variance <br /> Currently there are two 50' wide lakeshore lots containing less tha.n 10,000 s.f. of area. <br /> These 10,000 s.f. lots were legally platted prior to adoption of the current Zoning <br /> Ordinance. The applicants have proposed to combine these lots in an effort to gain more <br /> area and width to allow construction of a single family residential home. I�i cornbining <br /> these lots a net lot area of 18,490 s.f. is proposed when 43,560 s.f. is required; aud a lot <br /> width of 100.58' at the shoreline and 75' setback is proposed when 140' is normally <br /> required. The proposed lot area and lot width, when 1280 and 1290 are combined, do not <br /> meet the standards for administrative approval and therefore require fornlal approval of <br /> lot area and lot width variances. <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br /> additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardshi Anal sis <br /> In cofisidering applicatioris for►�aria�tce,t/:e Pla�uriiig Coi�rmissio�t s/iall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variai�ce rrpoii tke liealtlt,safety mrd rvelfare of the com��iunity,existi►�g and airticipated <br /> trafftc coitditioits,Iiglit a�rd air,daiiger of fire,risk to tlie public safety, axd tf:e effect oir i�altres of <br /> property in tl:e surroiiiidiiig area. Tlie Planni�cg Comn:issioii s/ia[l co�iside��recoi�imeiidiug approval <br /> for i�ariai�ces froin tl�e literal provisioits of tlte Zoiiiirg Code in i�:sta�ices where their strict <br /> e�:forcentent H�ottld catrse uitdtre hardsliip because of circu��istarices urtique to the indit�idua[ <br /> property trnder co�isideration, and sliall reco»iuiend approval only wleeii it is deirror�sti�ated that suc/r <br /> actions tvi[1 be i�i keepin�with the spirit a�ld irtteiit of tlre Oroito Zonix�Code. <br /> Staff finds that the hardship lies in the timeframe under which these lots were first <br /> platted. The existing house was constructed solely on 1280 prior to inid-1950's as well <br /> as single fanlily residences on 1270 and 1260 Spnice Place, all of which are 50' wide <br /> lakeshore lots. 1290 Spruce Place remains entirely vacant currently. Staff therefore finds <br /> that combination of 1280 and 1290, while still non-conforming in area and width, <br /> provides a more confonning situation than the remaining 50' wide lots to the north. The <br /> proposed plans confornl to tlie height and story restrictioils of the Zoning Ordinance aild <br />