Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 15,2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3069 G&L LAND INVESTMENTS, CONTINUED) <br /> Longman stated a 950' elevation is not their intent. <br /> Jurgens indicated he would like to see a grading plan to better understand the proposal and the amount of <br /> fill that would be required to verify that retaining walls are not necessary. <br /> Longman inquired whether a 944', 945' elevation for the pool would be okay. <br /> Rahn indicated the Planning Commission would like to see a plan depicting the elevations and the amount <br /> of fill that would be used as well as whether a fence would be constructed. <br /> Bremer inquired what type of fencing the applicant was considering. <br /> Longman stated he is contemplating an aluminum picket type fence. <br /> Leslie stated it is difficult to approve the application given the number of unknowns. <br /> Rahn noted the Planning Commission had previously voted to table the application to allow the applicant <br /> time to submit the requested information. <br /> Fritzler inquired whether they actually own the property. <br /> Longman stated they do. <br /> Fritzler indicated the walkout entrance should be secured because kids have been accessing the house. <br /> Jurgens noted the door has been kicked in and fires have been started in the fireplace. <br /> Longman stated the house has been secured a couple of times. <br /> Guilfoyle stated the house is scheduled to be demolished sometime this week. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether it is necessary to bring it back before the Planning Commission if Staff feels the <br /> applicant has lowered the elevation of the pool to the point where there are no negative impacts on the <br /> view of the neighbors. <br /> Kempf stated there were some concerns voiced regarding the slope and that he would like further <br /> clarification. <br /> Jurgens pointed out as long as it does not delay demolition of the house or construction of the new <br /> residence,that once the information is determined concerning the pool,it could be brought back before <br /> the Planning Commission to review the elevation of the pool and the slope. <br /> PAGE 17 <br />