My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
10/18/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 11:06:00 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 11:06:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 18,2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3062 John Terrance Homes,Continued) <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting an amendment of the Stonebay RPUD for changes to the <br /> condominium("Lofts")building and site plan, final site plan and building plan approvals as well as <br /> final plat approval for Outlot E as a single 2.5 acre lot for the condominium building. <br /> Gaffron noted a couple of years ago the entire Stonebay project was granted general development plan <br /> approval with some clauses in the development agreement requiring that a certain process had to be <br /> followed in the event of modifications. Gaffron noted some areas of the project have never been <br /> finalized. The primary changes to the Lofts building include: <br /> 1. Main building peak height is higher than originally proposed and is currently proposed <br /> somewhere between four feet and potentially as much as seven feet above the approved peak <br /> elevation. <br /> 2. The two buildings previously connected only by the underground parking level have been <br /> connected above ground by a central core which provides space for a variety of facilities and <br /> amenities for the residents. The applicants are now proposing a single L-shaped building. <br /> The central core includes a tower with peak height of 1084.4' or 10' above the peak of the <br /> main roofline. <br /> 3. The originally approved building was 80 feet from the west lot line with porches 72' from that <br /> line. The new plan has the building and porches at 74'. <br /> 4. The elevation plans have been revised significantly to incorporate different amounts and <br /> locations for the usage of cultured stone,horizontal lap siding and other facade elements. <br /> Gaffron stated although the plan has been modified,the same number of units are being proposed and <br /> the shape of the building remains essentially the same except for the connection of the two buildings. <br /> While the Lofts remain at a total of 62 owner-occupied units,the building now will have a visual front <br /> (south) facade of 370' and an east façade of about 236'. The southeast corner will include a tower <br /> feature extending 10 feet above the main roof system peak. The building will also have essentially flat <br /> facades with three-level deck bump-outs,providing some visual relief. <br /> Gaffron indicated the central core area provides space for a number of amenities not provided in the <br /> original concept. The site circulation has not changed, with access to the garages and the exterior <br /> parking layout remaining as originally approved. Retaining walls are still being proposed along the <br /> north wall of the west wing and the northerly three sides of the north wing. Gaffron indicated these <br /> walls are necessary to accommodate walkout access and an exterior perimeter sidewalk. <br /> Gaffron stated the Lofts building was originally granted a variance to the 30' RPUD height limit, <br /> allowing a 38' defined height. The new proposal has a majority of the overall roof peak at an <br /> elevation of 1074.4' or about 7.6 feet higher than what was originally approval. This is due in part to <br /> the increase in ceiling heights from 8' to 9' on all three levels of the building and the need to have a <br /> minimum garage floor elevation of 1020' as a result of final grading/stormwater system overflow <br /> parameters for the development. The applicants have suggested grading three feet higher against the <br /> south facade. Gaffron stated he has concerns regarding the area between the parking lot and the <br /> PAGE 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.