Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 18, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (Bill and Robin Grierson, Continued) <br /> Rahn noted there is currently living space also above the garage. <br /> Fritzler stated if the wing that goes to the north from the front door to the edge of the garage is raised <br /> in elevation, torn down or rebuilt,almost half of the house would be under construction. <br /> Grierson stated they are not planning on tearing that portion of the house down. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether that portion would be raised or elevated. <br /> Hanson stated the north wall is going to be kept,the front wall is going to be kept as far as location, <br /> but that there would be an extension out the front and a beam at the 33.9' that will carry the existing <br /> load so that cars can continue on through there without any wall. <br /> Rahn moved to recommend approval of Application#04-3061, 1989 Fagerness Point Road,for a <br /> hardcover variance to allow the front entry addition as proposed and to allow the rear addition, <br /> with the condition the hardcover not exceed the removal of 347 square feet of patio pavers in the <br /> 0-75' setback and with the further condition that the addition be in a conforming location within <br /> the 75'-250' setback. <br /> Jurgens noted there already is hardcover in the area where they are proposing the addition,which <br /> consists of a deck. <br /> Hansen stated there is an 81 square foot deck. <br /> Jurgens suggested adding the 81 square feet to the 347 square feet for the hardcover being removed. <br /> Rahn amended his motion to recommend approval of Application#04-3061, 1989 Fagerness <br /> Point Road,for a hardcover variance to allow the front entry addition as proposed and to allow <br /> the rear addition,with the condition the hardcover not exceed the removal of 428 square feet of <br /> patio pavers and deck, and with the further condition that the addition be constructed in a <br /> conforming location,i.e.,behind the 0-75' line. <br /> Curtis inquired what size landing would be allowed. <br /> Rahn stated they typically are allowed a four by four foot landing. <br /> Hansen stated the 428 square feet is in the 75'-250' zone,with the entire addition being 490'. <br /> Bremer stated the motion also requires the addition to be constructed behind the 0-75' line. <br /> Bremer seconded the above motion. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 29 <br />