My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
10/18/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 11:06:00 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 11:06:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 18, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3055 Dr.Martha Spencer,Continued) <br /> Winkey questioned why the gazebo was not part of the original plan. <br /> Spencer stated the gazebo was part of the original plan. <br /> Ritter stated the plan for the gazebo for some reason was never submitted to the City and only the deck <br /> was approved. <br /> Curtis stated at the time of the previous application there was a phone conversation between the <br /> applicant and staff concerning the gazebo but that no information was ever supplied to the City during <br /> the original application. <br /> Rahn pointed out one of the conditions for the hardcover variance was that the hardcover in the 0-75' <br /> setback zone shall not be increased above 8 percent. <br /> Curtis indicated the gazebo was discussed at the time of the application for the decks but that no <br /> information was ever supplied to the City. <br /> Bremer inquired whether any hardcover could be removed in the 0-75' zone. <br /> Spencer stated there is a cement dog pen. <br /> Jurgens noted the dog pen is not shown on the survey but is located closer to the shoreline. <br /> Spencer commented they have removed as much hardcover as possible. <br /> Fritzler stated he does not see a reason to increase the hardcover in this area and would not be in favor <br /> of a gazebo at this time. <br /> Ritter inquired whether the walkways would be permitted. <br /> Fritzler stated he is not in favor of the hardcover increasing. <br /> Curtis inquired whether the pathways are actual steps. <br /> Ritter indicated they are a combination of walkways and steps to enable the property owner to access <br /> her back yard. Ritter noted the walkway was shown on the original plan. <br /> Curtis stated the stairway as proposed is to get around in the yard and not to access the lakeshore. <br /> Rahn pointed out the only hardcover that is allowed to encroach in the 0-75' area would be a pathway <br /> from the home down to the lake. <br /> PAGE 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.