My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/20/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09/20/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 11:05:11 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 11:05:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 20,2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3051 Kevin and Julie Fitzpatrick,Continued) <br /> Gundlach indicated the applicants have met all structure coverage, lake setback, average lakeshore <br /> setback and hardcover requirements. The building inspector and city engineer have reviewed the <br /> proposed grading plan and recommended several changes,which the applicants have met. <br /> Gundlach noted the two neighbors to the south have submitted a letter objecting to the proposed <br /> variances. Staff has reviewed the letter in detail, and while staff agrees with the neighbors' position in <br /> theory, a property owner's right to develop clashes with this theory. Staff has included excerpts from <br /> the Community Management Plan regarding the City's policies on land development. <br /> Staff further finds that denial of the variances would be a significant change in policy as these types of <br /> requests are often made and approved. Gundlach indicated there are several neighborhoods where the <br /> City could have prevented rebuilding in hopes of land consolidation but never did. Staff is therefore <br /> recommending approval of the application. <br /> Kevin Fitzpatrick stated based on his review of Planning Commission minutes and City Council <br /> minutes, it appears that the City has typically approved lot area, lot width, and side yard setback <br /> variances on 50-foot lots in the past, and if the variances are denied, it would be a significant change in <br /> policy and would negatively impact this lot as well as the two landowners to the north of this property <br /> who also own 50-foot lots and other similar landowners throughout the City. <br /> Fitzpatrick indicated they have also come to understand through working with staff the idea of <br /> preservation and other rationale used by the City for when new construction happens. Fitzpatrick noted <br /> the structure was sold as a knock-down because of its faulty electrical system, deteriorating structure, <br /> and water in the basement. Fitzpatrick stated he hopes their proposed improvements will help bring this <br /> property more into compliance with the City's code. Fitzpatrick noted the hardcover is being eliminated <br /> in the 0-75' zone and is being reduced in the 75'-250' zone from 35 percent down to 25 percent. In <br /> addition,restoration of the lakeshore is being proposed along with improved drainage in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Fitzpatrick stated the Community Management Plan outlines the rights of a property owner, with the <br /> plan stating that all landowners must have equal land use opportunities. No landowner should be denied <br /> the right to develop his or her land by any stage growth, land banking, or no-growth policy,provided the <br /> development can be done consistent with the Community Plan. Fitzpatrick stated in his opinion <br /> isolating these three lots on West Lake would constitute land banking that would significantly restrict <br /> their rights to develop the property as well as the rights of other owners of 50-foot parcels throughout <br /> the city. <br /> Fitzpatrick indicated the second principle that drew his attention contained in the Community <br /> Management Plan is the preservation of neighborhoods. Fitzpatrick stated they were drawn to Orono <br /> for its neighborhoods and schools and the diversity of housing located within those neighborhoods. <br /> Fitzpatrick stated they are in agreement with the statement contained in the Community Management <br /> Plan that says most of Orono's existing urban neighborhoods are homogenous consisting of newer and <br /> older homes, intermingled with an occasional vacant lot or a large municipal lot. There is no single <br /> neighborhood that is in need of complete renewal or rehabilitation. Fitzpatrick stated the dominant land <br /> ownership on one street or complete rehabilitation of West Lake is contrary to the City's intention. <br /> PAGE 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.