My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/17/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
05/17/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:59:27 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:59:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> and,to recommend denial of a hardcover variance to reduce the existing 29.48% hardcover <br /> within the 75'-250' zone to 28.31%where 25% is normally allowed and to ask the applicants to <br /> reconfigure the proposed driveway(or other hardcover)to meet the 25% hardcover <br /> requirement. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 7,Nay 0. <br /> 14. #04-3016 HENRY LAZNIARZ OF WAYZATA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, 120 BROWN <br /> ROAD SOUTH, SUBDIVISION,PUBLIC HEARING(10:29-11:02 p.m.) <br /> Gaffron presented the proposed 7-lot residential plat(PRD)of property abutting the Luce Line Trail and Long <br /> Lake Creek. This property was the subject of extensive reviews by the Planning Commission and Council <br /> during the period 1999-2001. A variety of schemes ranging from 4 lots to 7 lots had been proposed,but the <br /> ultimate result was denial based on the lack of suitable access to the site. The proposal includes a private cul- <br /> de-sac road that accesses from Brown Road South. The proposal includes obtaining municipal water and <br /> sewer from the City of Long Lake. Legal actions taken by property owners,the Van Eeckhouts,resulted in <br /> findings filed on May 5,2004. City Attorney Tom Barrett reviewed the findings and concluded they indicate <br /> the existing access easement does not provide suitable access meeting all regular City requirements for <br /> subdivision. However,Mr. Barrett suggests that the City proceed with review of the application through the <br /> preliminary plat approval stage. If the developer ultimately cannot meet the conditions imposed by the City for <br /> final plat approval, final plat approval will not be granted. <br /> In staff's opinion,the property is a candidate for development as a PRD, due the physical nature of the <br /> property. There are only 14 non-wetland, dry buildable acres that are proposed to be subdivided into seven <br /> (7)lots. The seven home sites are proposed to be clustered within an area roughly 300' by 500', on the high <br /> knoll in the westerly quadrant of the property. <br /> Gaffron indicated the proposed individual lot lines will go all the way to the property boundary and <br /> emphasized that no open space outlots are proposed.This is not typical of what the Planning Commission has <br /> seen in prior approved PRD's,where there were outlot open spaces. Gaffron pointed out that with a larger, <br /> open space outlot,the perceptions of trespass are different than when the area is in individual lot ownership. <br /> The issue of individual lot ownership versus larger open space areas owned in common is one that the <br /> Planning Commission needs to determine. <br /> Gaffron advised the proposed PRD for residential purposes would be in conformity with the Community <br /> Management Plan(CMP)as long as density standards are met, that is, a density at 1 unit per 2 acres. He <br /> anticipates the perceived density of the clustered, compact layout of perhaps 2 units/acre with individual lots <br /> that actually range in gross area from 1.05 acres to 3.90 acres. <br /> Gaffron advised the individual lots do not meet all lot size or setback requirements of the R-1B District. The <br /> proposed 35' front and 10' side setbacks are typical of Orono's 1'acre zones. <br /> Gaffron observed that the proposed site layout and lot standards makes more sense than prior submittals as it <br /> no longer proposes long,narrow back lot necks with poor driveway patterns. Now it is a very clustered, <br /> compact development. <br /> Gaffron referred to the MnDNR comments in Exhibit H, supporting the conservation area and expressing <br /> reservations about individual lot's private access to the Luce Line trail. <br /> Gaffron continued he review the significant Subdivision Review points addressed in the Staff Report, dated <br /> May 14, 2004,noting its highlights. Included are 7 Issues for Consideration to be addressed by the Planning <br /> Commission and providing direction to staff and the applicant. Gaffron indicated that any recommendation for <br /> Page 33 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.