Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 12. #04-3014 TIMOTHY POWERS,3210 NAVARRE LANE,VARIANCE,PUBLIC HEARING <br /> (9:37-9:55 p.m.) <br /> Lynn Powers, 3210 Navarre Lane, applicant,was present. <br /> Gaffron presented the application for a 24.5' rear yard setback variance when 30' is normally required and <br /> 24.5' currently exists in order to construct a second story above the existing first story residence, and to add <br /> two garage stalls. The application is for a remodeling of the existing structure and not a rebuild, and submitted <br /> an opinion that the existing foundation will support the 2nd story addition. The existing garage is 24.5' from <br /> the rear lot line, and is proposed to be expanded eastward at that same setback. Gaffron advised the applicant <br /> proposed to remove the existing shed in an effort to decrease the non-conforming rear yard. He pointed out <br /> the adjacent lot to the north is the neighbor most affected by the non-conforming rear yard setback,however, <br /> the applicant's rear yard is acting as that neighbor's side year,where a 10' setback would normally be <br /> required. <br /> Gaffron indicated staff recommends approval of the rear yard setback as submitted,including the removal of <br /> the existing shed. He advised there were no hardcover issues to be addressed. Gaffron noted that if in the <br /> future the applicant wants to install the circular driveway it would require the Public Services Director review <br /> and approval. <br /> Lynn Powers, applicant,explained the architectural plans do show a more formal entry with a circular <br /> driveway but that is not being requested at this time. Chair Mabusth advised that three curb cuts on a smaller <br /> property might be difficult to acquire permits. Ms. Powers replied that if the circular driveway becomes <br /> impossible than perhaps a walkway could be considered. <br /> Ms. Powers confirmed they were advised the existing foundation can support a second story addition as it has <br /> good footings. <br /> Chair Mabusth invited the public to comment. <br /> Julie Copeland, 2180 Kenwood Way, stated she is the neighbor to the rear of the subject property. She <br /> indicated she is about 60' from the house and privacy is her primary concern. With a second story addition, <br /> she explained she would be more exposed, and noted that her side yard is where she plays with her dogs. Ms. <br /> Copeland asked for information about whether there will be a fence, what type of vegetation will be used,what <br /> type of rooms will be on the second story and that the property is being improved for investment purposes,but <br /> that she plans to remain. <br /> Ms. Powers confirmed that it is an investment property. She explained they intend to put up a nicer fence than <br /> what is there currently and will try to accommodate any issues of privacy. The second story main view will be <br /> to the front not to the rear yard. Ms. Powers stated the second story would have a master bedroom with bath, <br /> a walk-in closet, another bath and a smaller bedroom. The part of the house facing Ms. Copeland's property <br /> will have smaller windows, about 24-30"in size. She also stated the existing shed and deck will be removed. <br /> Chair Mabusth asked for further public comments. There were none. <br /> Fritzler moved,Leslie seconded,to recommend approval of Application#04-3014,Timothy and Lynn <br /> Powers,3210 Navarre Lane,granting a rear yard setback variance to allow a rear yard setback of 24.5' <br /> when 30' is normally required and 24.5' currently exists in order to construct a second story above the <br /> existing first story,and to add two garage stalls,and to recommend approval of the plans as submitted, <br /> including the removal of the existing shed. <br /> Page 28 of 40 <br />