My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/17/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
05/17/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:59:27 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:59:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. #04-3008 Steven Valek and Ralph Palmer, Continued) <br /> Mr.Valek stated he would accept the driveway condition and would deal with the potential of moving the <br /> driveway at a future time. <br /> Bremer moved,Leslie seconded,to recommend approval of Application#04-3008, Steven Valek and <br /> Ralph Palmer,4720 and 4750 Tonkaview,respectively,to re-plat five(5)lots(four tax parcels) existing <br /> lots to create three(3)lots with the stipulation that the existing driveway at 4720 Tonkaview Lane <br /> should be abandoned and relocated entirely within the property boundaries of this lot. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0,Abstain 1. <br /> Gaffron advised the application would be forwarded to the June 14, 2004 City Council meeting. <br /> 10. #04-3009 JAMES AND DARCY LOFFLER, 1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCE,PUBLIC <br /> HEARING(8:05-8:32 p.m.) <br /> James and Darcy Loffler,applicants, were present. <br /> Gaffron acknowledged receipt of a letter from John and Joan Fitzpatrick, 1710 Shadywood Road, dated May <br /> 12, 2004,which supported the variance request to exceed the 25%hardcover requirement. <br /> Gaffron introduced the application for a hardcover variance to construct a new residence on the property. <br /> Other variances that are needed for the proposed plan include: <br /> 1. Lot area(0.37 acre where 0.50 acre required; does not meet 80%rule) <br /> 2. Lot coverage by structures is proposed at 16.3%where only 15%is allowed as the recent survey work is <br /> showing the lot is actually smaller than the 1986 survey. <br /> 3. 75-250'Hardcover(Proposed=4,297 s.f./10,100 s.f. in zone=42.5%where 25%is allowed). <br /> Gaffron noted the site has an older home on it situated within the 0-75' setback, with a detached garage also in <br /> a non-conforming location. The applicant intends to remove all existing structures and the new house will <br /> meet average setback and 75' setback, as well as all other required setbacks. <br /> Gaffron explained that neighboring homes' are located just 55' from the shoreline, so the applicant would <br /> potentially be deprived of lake views as the new home is moved closer to the road to reduce hardcover. <br /> Moving closer to the road also negatively affects the average setback line for both neighbors, changing it to <br /> make their home less conforming. <br /> Gaffron recommended approval of the lot area variance, denial of the lot coverage variance and to approve <br /> some degree of hardcover variance in the 30-31%range rather than 42% as proposed. From staff's <br /> perspective,there is some hardship to support approval of a modest variance based on the lot shape and the <br /> need for a backup apron to allow forward vehicle movement onto Shadywood Road. <br /> Gaffron introduced the Issues for Consideration as listed in the Staff Report, dated May 12, 2004. <br /> He also confirmed that the Planning Commission and applicant received the full set of pages for the May 12, <br /> 2004 Staff Report. <br /> James Loffler, applicant,introduced his wife, Darcy, and Jeff Schneider, architect for the applicants, stated <br /> that as of today's surveyor re-measurement the lot area is 16,723 s.f., which is 0.1 acre larger than before. He <br /> expressed appreciation for the opportunity to share their views of the existing property hardships. Mr. Loffler <br /> stated they are trying to build a reasonable property and working with the ordinances,indicating it is not <br /> possible to build a master bedroom on the first floor as the house plan is not large enough and they cannot <br /> build more than a two-car garage due to hardcover restrictions. He illustrated that by moving the house further <br /> Page 21 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.