My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/19/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04/19/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:58:29 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:58:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (4. #04-2997 CITY OF ORONO, ACCESS BETWEEN LOTS 38 & 39, MORSE ISLAND <br /> PARK(120-140 BIG ISLAND), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,VARIANCE FOR <br /> WETLAND ALTERATION—Continued) <br /> Gaffron summarized the current proposal is to merely replace the 90' public right-of-way for the <br /> long-established access that was recently eliminated from the adjacent property. The proposed <br /> wetland and floodplain impacts are minimal and the City expects to meet MCWD requirements. <br /> Further, the City recognizes an obligation to re-establish this access with the least impact method <br /> given the limited options. Gaffron indicated the wetland alteration and floodplain impacts were <br /> scheduled for the April 22, 2004 MCWD agenda. The proposed access improvements do not expand <br /> the access nor provide more access to Big Island. <br /> Gaffron recommended approval of the variances and the conditional use permit requested by the <br /> applicant. <br /> Gappa concurred with Gaffron's summary, emphasizing that the request is basically for a <br /> replacement to an access that was there. There is no intent to expand the access from what had been <br /> there before but to leave the status quo of two access points. The access is 10' wide and pushed way <br /> to the south to minimize wetland impacts. Gappa anticipates the MCWD will require mitigation of <br /> the wetland buffer impacts so that a 16.5' buffer around the entire wetland will be put in place which <br /> is fine as the City's intent is only to build the road access with no other development activity on the <br /> site. He emphasized the application is a replacement of an access that for many years was thought to <br /> be on the public right-of-way but recent survey records indicated it was not the City's. The City <br /> Council's intent is to replace an existing access and not to provide more access to Big Island. This <br /> access is needed as it serves several land-locked parcels, too. <br /> Chair Mabusth asked Gappa if he was present at the City Council work session on April 8, 2004. <br /> Gappa responded that he was not in attendance at that work session but has read the meeting minutes <br /> and discussed the City Council's position with Gaffron. He briefly summarized the access issue <br /> background since a Big Island resident meeting in March 2003 and subsequent City Council and <br /> Planning Commission discussions of the matter. He confirmed that the City Council has no plan for <br /> additional access points on Big Island at this time or expanding vehicular use or tree removal, but is <br /> open to future considerations, with the current focus on this particular access replacement location. <br /> Chair Mabusth asked for clarification of efforts to minimize site impacts within the 0-75' shoreline <br /> area and the wetlands with the limitation of a 10' width. She questioned if the City is following all <br /> the MCWD guidelines or if there are other reviewing bodies. <br /> Gappa confirmed that the MCWD is the only other review body. <br /> Chair Mabusth asked for public comments. <br /> Cheryl Uran, 120-140 Big Island, stated that last time she was present, the Planning Commission had <br /> listened to them and gave a good solution that would work by getting the Big Island residents <br /> together to decide what to do. She believed that matter was taken out of their hands and returned to <br /> the Planning Commission. She expressed her disappointment in how the process had worked. <br /> Page 19 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.